Mad akhil 96

Girls Aloud

Please familiarise yourself with the inclusion guidelines for associated acts before re-adding that material. Thedarxide (talk) 16:46, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

December 2009

Warning

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you.

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Girls Aloud, you will be blocked from editing. Thedarxide (talk) 16:52, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Fight For this Love

STOP!!! You are breaking wikipedia rules. Go to WP:record charts and you will see that the {{singlechart}} template is being implemented accross record charts. If you remove again i will request that you be banned from wikipedia. Lil-unique1 (talk) 18:45, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

January 2010

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Sugababes discography. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Mister sparky (talk) 22:03, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Fight for this Love

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Fight for This Love, you will be blocked from editing. Lil-unique1 (talk) 18:33, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

successive reverting is against the rules. WP:revert. Additionally it says at WP:albums and WP:record charts about seperate tables for different charting years. Sales need to be verifiable and so stating that it appeared on the BBC without a proper source is not sufficient especially since BPI says its platinum (which equals 300,000 + sales). I am going to undo you edit and be warned if you revert again you will break the WP:3RR rule which is punishable by a ban. In future use the discussion page. Lil-unique1 (talk) 18:33, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

February 2010

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Frankie Sandford, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. XXX antiuser ^eh? 18:32, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Cheryl Cole

I've reverted your edit because I can see no use whatever in having the same information in two separate articles; it's unnecessary and a nightmare to keep consistent. Rodhullandemu 21:03, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

March 2010

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Fight For This Love, you will be blocked from editing. Jayy008 (talk) 00:20, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Cheryl Cole. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. 5 albert square (talk) 00:20, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

See WP:Reliable sources and WP:DISCOG

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Cheryl Cole discography‎, you will be blocked from editing. - eo (talk) 17:09, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for vandalism, disruption. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

- eo (talk) 17:21, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

inflation of sales figures without a proper source

This is the only warning that you are receiving regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Cheryl Cole discography, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - eo (talk) 20:12, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

block

You either don't choose to learn or you just don't care about Wikipedia policies or talk page communication. In this edit [1] you again added unsourced and incorrect sales certifications to Cheryl Cole discography. Enough is enough.

You have been blocked from editing, for a period of 2 weeks, for disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

- eo (talk) 14:52, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

Cheryl Cole discography

10 charts in table, per WP:DISCOG. This is not the first time you've been told about this. [2]

This is the only warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Cheryl Cole discography, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - eo (talk) 15:19, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Cheryl Cole discography

You have been blocked from editing, for a period of 1 month, for disruptive editing, see below. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

• Even after numerous warnings, here [3] you added an 11th column to the table again, against consensus at WP:DISCOG
• Here [4] you changed the country in the succession table without verifying any of the before/after info and you just removed the country that was there, with no explanation.
• These kinds of edits are a disruption. Your blocks are getting longer and it doesn't seem as if you care to acknowledge any Talk Page communication or make any attempts to help the Wikipedia process or adhere to any policies or style guidelines. - eo (talk) 16:14, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mad akhil 96 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Im very sorry but when i added norway singles chart becasue it was nubmer 1 i was meant to get rid of italy signles chart because it was the lowest peak and norway was very high also in fight for this love i got ride of the contry beacause there was to off them and it actually was meant to be norways nubmer one single i am very sorry and hope you unblock me and i Promise i will never do it again

Decline reason:

Either you did this deliberately despite all the previous warnings and blocks, or you lack the basic level of competence required to understand those warnings. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:00, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Still adding unsourced information to articles

Per this edit: [5]
This is the only warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Cheryl Cole discography, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - eo (talk) 16:29, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

October 2011

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Hurt (Christina Aguilera song), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. I see you've been warned and blocked multiple times for this, so consider this a final warning, again. Do not introduce unsourced material, or even worse, material against the available sources. If the source says Gold, leave it at Gold, not Platinum. Muhandes (talk) 11:01, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Lana Del Rey discography, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages SWI and AUS (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:29, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for Mar 2

Hi. When you recently edited United Kingdom, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Duffy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

United Kingdom - Sugababes

Why did you remove Sugababes from the Music section of United Kingdom? The band had number one hits in many countries like New Zealand, Ireland, Denmark, and Austria and sold 10 million albums. If you remove it again I will notify an administrator. Till I Go Home (talk) 09:00, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

April 2012

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sugababes discography. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Till I Go Home (talk) 01:43, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

May 2012

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to Girls Aloud discography does not have an edit summary. Don't undo my edits and then not leave an edit summary. Till I Go Home (talk) 08:50, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

July 2012

Please stop your disruptive editing. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in you being blocked from editing. _{MusicFreak7676} ^TALK! 18:04, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Girls Aloud, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pop (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:49, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

Vandalism

Please desist from vandalizing Wikipedia (as you did with Cheryl Cole) or your IP will be blocked from editing privileges. Quis separabit? 14:59, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

March 2014

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Black Kite (talk) 19:37, 10 March 2014 (UTC)