User talk:MadeYourReadThis/Archives/2010/October

becogent

Conflict of interest or factual contributer? As you say, soursces have to be referenced so it makes no difference if I edit the article with such refernces or someone else does! However, I appreciate your guidance. As for the offending article- Firstly names of Directors were changed- Ron Jeremy and Dermot O'Leary. This is demeaning and inaccurate, the latter being a reality TV presenter as opposed to our CEO - Scottish Enterprener of the Year 2010!. The list of clients was change to include sexual connetations and inaccurate information that clearly impacts the reputation of beCogent and its clients many of whom are top UK & International businesses. See below. Its current clients are listed below;

Durex [Gay sex line company] Vodka Martini [Navid's corner shop] JD Williams - a company that sells dildos to drooping ladies Lambert and Butler Fortnum & Mason House of Fraser Office Shoes B&Q Sainsbury's Polo Ralph Lauren WorldStores

The changes then and continue to misrepresent the business- unemployer of the year/large turn over of staff/ex manager ...... See below

beCogent has won a number of prestigious awards, some of the most recent include Unemployer of the Year at the Orange National Business Awards for the UK and Employer of the Year and Business of The Year at the Orange National Business Awards For Scotland 2008.

beCogent is also highly known for it's large staff turnover and an ex-manager who got it up the arse whilst at work in McDonalds.

Further changes to Director's names or roles again is deameaning, incorrect and salacious.Pete Doherty is a high profile musiscian with a well know drug habit... See below.

Current directors of beCogent are Dermot Jenkinson (Executive Chairman), Pete Doherty (Commercial and Operations Director), (Finance Director), Jackie Lowe (Human Resources Director) and Dave Halford (Chief jobby jabber). Jim Nikrant and Eddie Bell-End are non-executive directors of the company.

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BeCogent"

80.194.100.111 (talk) 09:44, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for writing back. Take a look at the article now, it's been reduced to a single paragraph with the most relevant information about the company, including it's recent acquisition by another telemarketing company. I think you'll find that all of the items you mention above have been resolved. If there are any others, please discuss them on the article's talk page rather than on my talk page so that other editors can take part as well.

As for the conflict of interest, keep in mind that the purpose of Wikipedia is a produce a neutral, reliable sourced encyclopedia. When someone who represents a company edits an article about that company and provides no references, especially if they are doing it from an anonymous IP address, it raises concerns. This is why editors with a conflict of interest such as this are strongly discouraged from editing articles where they have that conflict. If you feel that information is missing or inaccurate, you should instead discuss this on the articles talk page. Another, more neutral editor can help.

You should also consider creating an account. It has a lot of benefits beyond what you are seeing now editing anonymously.--RadioFan (talk) 12:07, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

Charles "Rusty" Goodman

He's been dead for twenty years, so I removed your BLP prod. According to WP:MUSIC, he also appears to be notable, having gotten several awards. Bearian (talk)

Proposed deletion of Radio World

The article Radio World has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No reliable sources to establish notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sailsbystars (talk) 02:31, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

Morris Madden

I'm the one who wrote the article you tagged for deletion. There is a source in the article. The same one used in 99% of baseball articles on Wikipedia, it's called Baseball Reference. The Madden article has Madden's article as an external link. Where in the guidelines is it stated the reference must be inline?

All major league baseball players are considered noteworthy enough for an article. I'm going to remove the deletion template.William 00:08, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

I dont question his notability, but as a living person, it must be referenced. I saw the link to baseball-reference but it was in external links. If you used this as a citation it would be clearer that this is where you got the information from. I've added a references section so your citation will show up there automatically.--RadioFan (talk) 00:14, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:WMJE logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:WMJE logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:41, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Chatham Journal for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Chatham Journal, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chatham Journal until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Abductive (reasoning) 03:19, 27 October 2010 (UTC)