User talk:MadeYourReadThis/Archives/2018/February

00:49:54, 1 February 2018 review of submission by Cheryl Fullerton

• Cheryl Fullerton (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Acoustic Highway (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I just want a little clarification on the source. Are not the LA Times, Billboard Magazine, or Allmusic considered reliable sources? Cheryl Fullerton (talk) 00:49, 1 February 2018 (UTC)Cheryl Cheryl Fullerton (talk) 00:49, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Request on 09:46:30, 4 February 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by Jgdc47B

• Jgdc47B (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Ealing Art Guild (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello. Firstly, thanks for your note which, I confess, I was a bit disappointed to relieve. I thought I had made a careful separation of Citations from Notes in the way that the first reviewer had requested. Can you advise me on where I have gone wrong? Thanks John Jgdc47B (talk) 09:46, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

Jgdc47B (talk) 09:46, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

20:37:29, 3 February 2018 review of submission by Jgdc47B

• Jgdc47B (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Ealing Art Guild (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Thanks for your note. I thought I had worked hard since the first rejection to distinguish between citations and note. Where have I gone wrong? Jgdc47B (talk) 20:37, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

I dont doubt that your put effort into the article, but once I noticed the same problems the previous reviewer noted, I looked at the diff between your submissions. <ref tags were changed to the ref template and few citations were added, which is a good thing, plus the Music Section section was added. The notes section remains very very large, filled with random bits of information which remain unclear how they connect to the article. This may make sense to you, but it is not making sense to 2 reviewers. --MadeYourReadThis (talk) 12:49, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

I’m still puzzled! Citation 4, for example, is a source for more information about John Dovaston; 10 is a source for more info about one of the exhibitions; 12 expands on the life of the artist; and so on. Isn’t that what citations are about? Jgdc47B (talk)

Rejected draft

Hey there, sorry for answering this late, but I had other things to take care of.

Can you please link me the related guidelines, so that I can understand what's missing and try to write down a better draft? Also, I'm not OK with merging this with the article about the Institute, because they are two different things (and also I was planning to rework both the Italian and English articles in the next months). --Sannita (ICCU) (talk) 14:59, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:WRGR logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:WRGR logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:15, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:KCJC logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:KCJC logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:21, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:KGFL (AM) logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:KGFL (AM) logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:24, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:WCYN-FM logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:WCYN-FM logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:16, 24 February 2018 (UTC)