Madi.heisterman
| This user is a student editor in University_of_Washington/Interpersonal_Media_(Fall_2020) . |
Welcome!
editHello, Madi.heisterman, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
|---|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 02:00, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
Welcome!
editGreetings Madi.heisterman and welcome (again!) to both Wikipedia and to COM482!
We talked about your article at office hours last week so I don't think I have too much to add what to I said then. The topic (Canada at the 2007 World Championships in Athletics) is good and I think we identified a few other good articles on related topics that you can build off of (including some linked to from Wikipedia:WikiProject Athletics.
One thing I noticed is that you're making your changes in Canada at the 2007 World Championships in Athletics and not in your User:Madi.heisterman/Canada at the 2007 World Championships in Athletics (your sandbox). Not a huge problem it's probably best to iterate on things a bit first and get some more feedback—from myself and from your classmates—before you start copying stuff over and making the text live. —mako๛ 18:44, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
Peer Review
editHey Madi, I just finished some peer review of your article. Canada is dope! ````IsaacM24 — Preceding unsigned comment added by IsaacM24 (talk • contribs) 21:34, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
Feedback on your draft
editGreetings Madi.heisterman! I've done a quick pass on User:Madi.heisterman/Canada at the 2007 World Championships in Athletics and, although the changes and added references are modest, it looks good to me. A couple points:
- I added one "citation needed" flag to the article. You might want to look for other unsourced claims since much of the new text you added to that claim looks unsourced. I'm sure you found some source but you should make sure it's being invoked as a reference on the sentences making the claims.
- If there's more you can add in terms of either prose or references, that would be helpful.
In any case, I don't see any problem with what you've added. Why don't you go ahead and start moving things over to live version. If you want to make more changes to the article, you just doing it in the live version. Good luck and thanks for your work on the article! —mako๛ 18:57, 4 November 2020 (UTC)