User talk:Madscientist013/Archive 2007
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
November 2007
3RR
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing at Funeral for a Fiend. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. -- Scorpion0422 05:08, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
read number 3 under tasks on the project page and look at all the good articles on the page, and notice how none have that, and their CR sections are in paragraph form, and are referenced! Ctjf83 05:09, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
- He is correct, The Simpsons WikiProject has worked to remove goofs sections from all articles. -- Scorpion0422 05:11, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
Whatever, this is a witch hunt. --Madscientist013 (talk) 05:13, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
- What are you talking about? I only reverted the trivia related section twice User:Dlong made the other revert, therefor you did it 3 times, i did it twice, and he did it once Ctjf83 05:23, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
- Oh, read number 4 then Ctjf83 05:26, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
- wow, that was pointless and inaccurate Ctjf83 05:27, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
- Oh, read number 4 then Ctjf83 05:26, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
- What are you talking about? I only reverted the trivia related section twice User:Dlong made the other revert, therefor you did it 3 times, i did it twice, and he did it once Ctjf83 05:23, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |