Akashrojekar, you are invited to the Teahouse!

edit
 

Hi Akashrojekar! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like John from Idegon (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:08, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Unblock

edit

@Callanecc:@Cabayi:@Bbb23:@RoySmith:@Ivanvector:@JimRenge:@Aman.kumar.goel:@QueerEcofeminist:

The decision to block me is wrong, as I have nothing to do with संदेश हिवाळे or Vijay bramhane's accounts. Since my favorite writing subject is B. R. Ambedkar, I have seen the edits of Vijay bramhane user in the history of this article, some of which were removed due to lack of references. I made some corrections with that text references and reinserted them into the article. I also saw this user's edits on other Ambedkar related pages; I made corrections to that as well, and corrected the deleted edits and re-wrote them. This is why some edits between me and Vijay bramhane show similarities. But, it is wrong to argue from this that mine and Vijay bramhane's account is the same, or we are both the same person. While editing on Marathi and Hindi Wikipedia, I have seen संदेश हिवाळे edits on various articles, I have checked his editing history. I brought some of those important datas to the English Wikipedia. This is why some of my edits look similar to संदेश हिवाळे's edits. But I have nothing to do with संदेश हिवाळे account. I know Nanasaheb Shendkar, so I created his English article. But this does not mean, both संदेश हिवाळे and I are one person. It is a completely wrong argument to understand both of us. On the talk page of "History of Buddhism in India", I saw Vijay bramhane's discussion, I agreed with his view, but no one participated in that discussion. So I requested a change of title. That is all. For this reason, some of my edits appear to correspond to the edits made by Vijay bramhane and संदेश हिवाळे. But, I run my account myself, it has nothing to do with संदेश हिवाळे or Vijay bramhane. Please, see my other contributions, I have never made any incorrect edits. Most of my edits have nothing to do with both these accounts. My account is not a sock puppet of संदेश हिवाळे. So it is wrong to associate my account with those two accounts. I have been punished without fault. So I request the senior Wikipedians to unblock me and give me fair justice. Mahi914101 (talk) 16:43, 28 December 2019 (UTC)Reply