January 2023

edit

  Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Draft:Madhab Chandra Jena. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. Philipnelson99 (talk) 03:08, 16 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, Makardhwaj, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Omkrishnajena (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Belbury (talk) 08:31, 21 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Dear sir, I have a single account,I wanted to contribute for odisha related drafts.I edit the drafts without any issue for others but when I tried to edit Madhab Chandra Jena draft my account is blocked without any reason.I am a new editor if have minor issues in editing it can be corrected, but mere blocking the account forces me to create a new account.I am helpless now, raised this point in the forum many times but nobody here in helping mode.Thank you for your understanding.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Makardhwaj (talkcontribs) 10:07, 21 January 2023 (UTC)Reply


  You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Omkrishnajena. Thank you. Belbury (talk) 10:14, 21 January 2023 (UTC) I keep copy of all drafts made by others for odisha related articles.Hence I could contribute largely or can create the draft.May be Om krishna sockpuppetis only due to thatReply

Thank you for your support and understanding.Please help.I have a deep interest to contribute to Odisha related wikipedia articles Makardhwaj (talk) 10:27, 21 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Blocked as a sockpuppet

edit
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Omkrishnajena per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Omkrishnajena. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Mz7 (talk) 22:46, 21 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

I know it will happen anyone trying to edit wikipedia you are blocking it in the name of suck puppet and I am getting mails that you are trying to open the pages but not successful.Please send 450 dollar we will open your account.That means there is a big money racket going on.Agents are running whole wikipedia, it is clear now.

Suckpuppet is a way of blocking editors who is trying to open the page in legitimate way.The agents are opening g the account by taking money how they are not blocked in the name of suckpuppet that means there is a big racket going on in the name of fair policy.It should be investigated properly. Makardhwaj (talk) 02:32, 22 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Someone want to edit the page you are blocking the editor.If he opens another account then he is a suckpuppet but when agents are collecting huge dollars they are very fair.We dont know what is going on internally. Makardhwaj (talk) 02:35, 22 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

You are blocking without any reason this is the pure sign of vandalism.Can you show me one case of abuse what you have written here. Makardhwaj (talk) 02:36, 22 January 2023 (UTC)Reply