Makeybussines

This is my talk page, well, do you want to talk? Makeybussines (talk) 03:03, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Educa

The article was up for half an hour before it was tagged for deletion, and another half an hour before I deleted it. During that time it did not indicate why the company was important or significant; it was just a one-sentence description. The version that you have above is better, since it incorporates a reference that shows the company has been discussed in third-party sources. (If that reference had been in the first version it probably wouldn't have been tagged for deletion.) We're not trying to be hard on you and I apologise if it seemed that way. One way to avoid speedy deletion (if the article doesn't yet indicate notability) is to start the article in your sandbox or elsewhere in your user space, and then move it out when it's ready. ... discospinster _talk 22:59, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

I would suggest adding one more reliable source before going "live". If you can't find one right away, you can put the article out there but add the {{refimprove}} tag to signal that more sources are needed. This probably wouldn't prevent someone from proposing deletion but it could another speedy deletion. ... discospinster _talk 23:13, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

This might be a helpful source to add (though a better one would be, say, a newspaper article): http://www.growwellington.co.nz/page/casestudies/name/Education_goes_digital.aspx. ... discospinster _talk 23:16, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

I'll dig something out. Thank you very much for your time and help which is much appreciated <3 Makeybussines (talk) 23:22, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Educa ltd logo, launch April 2011.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Educa ltd logo, launch April 2011.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:20, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Te Whāriki

The article Te Whāriki has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence this concept is notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 13:35, 28 December 2020 (UTC)