Malakaville
I find your Username to be against WP:U. You state in your User page that it is in reference to Malakas. As you know, WP:U states that "names that refer to or imply sexual acts, genitalia, or sexual orientation including slang, innuendo, and double entendre" are Inflammatory usernames. Furthermore "Wikipedia does not allow potentially inflammatory or offensive user names. Inflammatory usernames are needlessly discouraging to other contributors, and disrupt and distract from our task of creating an encyclopedia." I insist that you change your Username. Agha Nader 06:23, 5 February 2007 (UTC)Agha Nader.
- No, I didn't know that policy, but I do know that WP isn't censored. I insist that you have too much time on your hands and lack a sense of humour. I'm glad I don't know people like you in real life. Malakaville 07:14, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
- I am going to disregard you ill-considered insinuations since you are new to Wikipedia. But please see WP:CIV. Furthermore, I hope you will consider changing your user name. Agha Nader 12:26, 7 February 2007 (UTC)Agha Nader
- I am going to reccomend that you read up on WP:CIVIL, and try to handle things in a calm manner. If you continue uncivil behavior, there is a strong possiblity that you will end up blocked for being uncivil and disruptive. (as well as it wont help your case for your username). If you have any questions, please feel free to ask me on my user talk page. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 13:46, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
- As somebody on the discussion said. Let me help you. I posted this as a friendly reminder. I agree, it is a bit far out. My comments were meant in no way to bully you, however give you a heads up that some of the comments you have made may appear to be uncivil. I have been following the discussion and do not have a lot of control over the outcome. However, I do hope this controversy does not discourage you too much! That is why I offered to help in any way that I can (within my power). -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 13:56, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
- I am going to reccomend that you read up on WP:CIVIL, and try to handle things in a calm manner. If you continue uncivil behavior, there is a strong possiblity that you will end up blocked for being uncivil and disruptive. (as well as it wont help your case for your username). If you have any questions, please feel free to ask me on my user talk page. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 13:46, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
- I am going to disregard you ill-considered insinuations since you are new to Wikipedia. But please see WP:CIV. Furthermore, I hope you will consider changing your user name. Agha Nader 12:26, 7 February 2007 (UTC)Agha Nader
Hello, Malakaville. While there had been some discussion here about whether your username met Wikipedia policy on what usernames editors can use, the result was to allow it, and that discussion has now been closed. If you would like to see what concerns were raised, you can still find that discussion in the archive. You do not need to change your username. However, if you ever wish to do so, it is possible for you to keep your present contributions history under a new name: simply request a new name here following the guidelines on that page, rather than creating a whole new account. Thank you. -- HighInBC (Need help? Ask me) 20:06, 7 February 2007 (UTC) HighInBC (Need help? Ask me) 20:06, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
Don't Freak Out
editWhile I think you should change your user name, I just think it right that you realize that you are not the only one who has encountered certain problems. See [1] and [2]. Judge for yourself. I think you will see what I mean in saying that you aren't alone. The Behnam 02:31, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Once again
editThe consensus is not to disallow your username. Sorry for the confusion. HighInBC (Need help? Ask me) 03:49, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Punctuation
editHahah. You know, I just reread the discussion of your username and I finally understand what you meant by "See malakas - this means you!" This is one of those rare cases where punctuation makes all the difference in the world. All this time I was reading it as "Hey you malakas, I'm talking about you!" But if it were punctuated differently, I would have immediately understood your meaning. See: malakas (This means you!)
Aelffin 13:29, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- Ahhh, i get it now too. lol. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 13:49, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, you are certainly correct about the worth of proper punctuation. Its one of those situations for Curb Your Enthusiasm. ;) Malakaville 04:49, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
Black African Bias
editPlease see my comments in your racist moved article "European African" and take steps to cure this abhorrent case of reversed racism and Black African bias against WHITE AFRICANS.