Mambojazz1

March 2016

Hello, I'm Eteethan. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Isaiah Richardson Jr.— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Eteethan(talk) 19:41, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Isaiah Richardson Jr.. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. JimVC3 (talk) 19:59, 2 March 2016 (UTC) This entire post is incorrect. It is called correction.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Isaiah Richardson Jr.. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:06, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Isaiah Richardson Jr., you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Isaiah Richardson Jr. was changed by Mambojazz1 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.961186 on 2016-03-03T16:18:47+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:18, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

It is not disruptive. The entire post is inaccurate. I added what needs to be there. I AM ISAIAH RICHARDSON JR!!!! The New York Times article is false. It is a lie. Read the other articles. Obvious http://www.thejewishweek.com/news/new-york/klezmer-notes-underground#comment-199955

Isaiah Richardson Jr.

Your recent editing history at Isaiah Richardson Jr. shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
You cannot add the kind of material you added to the article recently. You have now made 6 reverts in the last 24 hours, which in itself will get you blocked. If you revert once, more you'll be taken the edit-warring noticeboard. Please read the above warning carefully and discuss your issues calmly at Talk:Isaiah Richardson Jr.. Voceditenore (talk) 17:04, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Isaiah Richardson Jr.. -- Michael Scott Cuthbert (talk) 17:51, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Mambojazz1 reported by User:Mscuthbert (Result: ). Thank you. -- Michael Scott Cuthbert (talk) 17:55, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Blocked for 31 hours for edit warring

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring, as you did at Isaiah Richardson Jr.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

When you return from this block, please discuss the changes you intend to make at Talk:Isaiah Richardson Jr. and convince others they are correct. Also, listen to what others have to say, and arrive at a consensus. Attempting to force others to accept your own version of an article, by repeatedly shouting at them and pushing your own version through by sheer force of will is not allowed at Wikipedia. Instead, we talk civilly about our concerns, we listen to other people, and we try to arrive at a civil consensus to solve our disagreements. --Jayron32 17:57, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Isaiah Richardson Jr. AfD

I am writing to all those who have participated in editing this article that I have now nominated it for deletion. The discussion is at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Isaiah Richardson Jr. – Voceditenore (talk) 09:12, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Isaiah Richardson Jr.

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. RickinBaltimore (talk) 13:56, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Just to add I tagged the page for deletion because creating the article in mainspace wasn't the right venue for your question. You might want to pose your question at the helpdesk instead, and you may get a better answer there. RickinBaltimore (talk) 13:58, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Hello Mambojazz1. I think what happened is that the old version of the deleted article is mirrored at deletedwikipedia.gawker-labs.com If you saw that article, it wasn't what the current real Wikipedia page says. That's why you found it empty when you tried to edit it. Unfortunately, there's nothing we can do about mirror sites like this, although at least it doesn't appear in the first page of the Google results for "Isaiah Richardson Jr.". Best wishes, Voceditenore (talk) 16:10, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Re: Why am I blocked from editing?

You probably got caught in my block of the dog and rapper vandal. To avoid this, please make sure you're logged in when you're trying to edit here. Graham87 10:56, 10 December 2018 (UTC)