Manish 8726
August 2013
edit
Hello, I'm Plarem. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Swaminarayan without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! – Plarem (User talk) 10:09, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Swaminarayan, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. PantherLeapord|My talk page|My CSD log 01:42, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
hi my self manish. i request to you that please remove immediately your post about criticism of swaminarayan page.it is a totally fake information given by you.i have all the proof about swaminarayn.he do not make any injustice. your postleads to hurt feelings of all Indians and bhakta.
Manish 8726 (talk) 03:17, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Swaminarayan, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Ugog Nizdast (talk) 07:22, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
Welcome
editHi Manish, and first of all, welcome to Wikipedia! The content that you removed was properly sourced. Removal of sourced content requires agreement from other users first, and if you feel that the content does not belong there, you can voice your opinion on improving the article on its talk page. Continuously removing the content will not serve your purpose here, since that counts as edit warring which is strictly prohibited (See WP:BRD). The article which you currently have your conflict also happens to be a good article which means that it's reliable sourced and most likely is not inaccurate or "fake", also Wikipedia is not censored and here, we maintain a neutral point of view. Why don't you take time reading these links?
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Simplified Manual of Style
If you still have any doubts, you can ask me by replying here itself. Sincerely, Ugog Nizdast (talk) 07:47, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
Talkback
edit
Message added 09:25, 7 August 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
– Plarem (User talk) 09:25, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
Your recent edits to User talk:Ugog Nizdast could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content, not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. NeilN talk to me 03:27, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
- Please remove the legal threat on the talk page immediately. --NeilN talk to me 03:28, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
Notice
edit
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Clear legal threats. Thank you. NeilN talk to me 03:45, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved. Gamaliel (talk) 03:51, 8 August 2013 (UTC)