Margosbot~enwiki

Bad edit

I don't know whether this account is an actual bot (the User page really should say if it is) but this edit really messed up an article. (I've restored.) -- Jmabel | Talk 15:38, Apr 27, 2005 (UTC)

Stop! r3m0t ^talk 13:19, Apr 29, 2005 (UTC)

Margosbot is out of control

Moved from Wikipedia_talk:Bots#Margosbot is out of control

Just take a look at a topic on boxing i edited yesterday. And the bot had cut the topic abrubptly in the midway of a sentance in the "personalities" subsection. Without adding worthwile or editing anything else, this is clearly a bot that's gone crazy. I'm reverting to the older complete version. and it didn't even add the "+pl" it was supposed to do. dumb bot.

I would watch this bot closely and pull the plug if it does one more thing like this.

• Don't worry. The bot is stopped ( Message on talk page stops it). I'm sure that problem is related to the server. The server do not saved all information sent (bot logs analysis) . At the moment another bot is verifing all edits. Margospl 22:41, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Verification done. No more such accidents found. 2 bad edits among nearly 3000 is ok. Margospl 08:05, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Resuming. Margosbot 10:04, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Small bug

Your bot has a small bug, see here. Does not matter much, but still, it is good if that is fixed at one time. Thanks. Oleg Alexandrov 21:59, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)

This causes the string en:Interpolation to show up at the bottom of the page. Oleg Alexandrov 22:00, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Bug fixed. Thanks Oleg. Margospl 07:10, 1 May 2005 (UTC)

Pune

Thank you for your contribution at Pune. Please keep it up!!! - P R A D E E P Somani (talk) Feel free to send me e-mail. This is a automated to all bot operators Please take a few moments and fill in the data for your bot on Wikipedia:Bots/Status Thank you Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 19:40, 12 February 2007 (UTC) Automated message to bot owners As a result of discussion on the village pump and mailing list, bots are now allowed to edit up to 15 times per minute. The following is the new text regarding bot edit rates from Wikipedia:Bot Policy: Until new bots are accepted they should wait 30-60 seconds between edits, so as to not clog the recent changes list and user watchlists. After being accepted and a bureaucrat has marked them as a bot, they can edit at a much faster pace. Bots doing non-urgent tasks should edit approximately once every ten seconds, while bots who would benefit from faster editing may edit approximately once every every four seconds. Also, to eliminate the need to spam the bot talk pages, please add Wikipedia:Bot owners' noticeboard to your watchlist. Future messages which affect bot owners will be posted there. Thank you. --Mets501 04:17, 22 February 2007 (UTC) Margosbot deflagged Your bot, Margosbot which was approved and flagged some time ago has now been deflagged due to inactivity. If you wish to run your bot again, feel free to return to the requests for bot approval page where you can reapply for your bot's task and flag. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact a member of the BAG or myself. WjBscribe 01:53, 1 December 2007 (UTC) Your account will be renamed Hello, The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information. Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Margosbot. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Margosbot~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed. Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in. Sorry for the inconvenience. Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 01:20, 20 March 2015 (UTC) Renamed This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 15:56, 22 April 2015 (UTC) ArbCom elections are now open! Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)