Maria Bernada

Rosary

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your recent work on the Rosary article. Before reverting (undoing) another editors edits, you should discuss the matter first on the talk page. That is a way to integrate content into the article without causing repeated disruptions to the article. In addition to the three core Wikipedia policies (WP:Notability, WP:Verifiability, WP:No original research), please also have a look at the 3 revert rule (WP:3RR). It is against Wikipedia policy to repeated revert another editors edits. The talk page allows for consensus to be built without having to revert edits. Conducting more than 3 reverts in an article within any 24 hour period is a violation of Wikipedia policy and may result in being blocked. Dgf32 (talk) 21:44, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

A Simple Citation for an Online Source

Original text: Regardless of the origin of the rosary, it was greatly promoted by the preaching of the Dominican priest Alan de Rupe, who helped to spread the devotion in France, Flanders, and the Netherlands between 1460 and his death in 1475.

Text with citation markup visible: Regardless of the origin of the rosary, it was greatly promoted by the preaching of the [[Dominican]] [[priest]] [[Alan de Rupe]], who helped to spread the devotion in [[France]], [[Flanders]], and the [[Netherlands]] between 1460 and his death in 1475.<ref>[http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/01246a.htm McNicholas, J.T. "Alanus de Rupe". ''The Catholic Encyclopedia''. New York: Robert Appleton Company, 1907.]</ref>

How reference will appear in reference section:

Feel free to experiment in the Sandbox --Dgf32 (talk) 06:56, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Maria Bernada, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Oore (talk) 01:36, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

Marie Luois Trichet

Hi, it seems that you found a very good reference about her life. I started that page, but am busy with other things. Would you like to expand that page?

If so, the simple thing to remember is to "use your own words" and not the exact same sentences as on the long biography they have, so there will be no copyright problems. This can usually be done by using alternate words to theirs, restructuring a sentence etc.

My suggestion for a structure:

Her life's work

Early life

includes meeting Montfort

Final years

includes beatification

Her writings and spirituality

If you like, I can give suggestions as we go along. Else I will do it a a few months.

Cheers History2007 (talk) 17:05, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Material heresy

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as Material heresy, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Ironholds (talk) 23:41, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Deletion review for Material heresy

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Material heresy, essentially appealing the earlier “speedy deletion” of that article. Because you appear to be the original author of the page in question, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Bwrs (talk) 01:20, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Methods of praying the rosary for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Methods of praying the rosary is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Methods of praying the rosary until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fram (talk) 12:30, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Material heresy for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Material heresy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Material heresy (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Veverve (talk) 14:10, 22 January 2023 (UTC)