Marius Kristiansen, you are invited to the Teahouse!

edit
 

Hi Marius Kristiansen! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Lectonar (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 20 April 2021 (UTC)


April 2021

edit

  Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Battle of Julin Bridge, from its old location at User:Marius Kristiansen/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Iflaq (talk) 23:15, 20 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle at Julin Bridge has been accepted

edit
 
Battle at Julin Bridge, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 01:09, 21 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

The battle of Jelling moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, The battle of Jelling, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jack Reynolds (talk to me | email me) 17:47, 3 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Siege of Schleswig moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Siege of Schleswig, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Gpkp [utc] 08:01, 26 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Battle of Jellinge Heath moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Battle of Jellinge Heath, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:54, 26 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Siege of Schleswig moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Siege of Schleswig, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:58, 26 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Referencing

edit

Hi — I've just moved two of your recently-created articles into the draft space. They've been previously deleted or draftified for lacking sufficient references; the way to deal with that is not to republish them, but to ensure that the references are adequate to support the article contents. A single source, cited one or only a few times, is not enough. Please do not move these to the mainspace, or recreate them again, before they are ready and properly supported. Thank you. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:02, 26 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

I don't know what you mean by reliable independant sources. Nearly all we know of the Danish Civil war is from Saxo Grammaticus (the one i reference is a 1898 translation), so i think if you know of any other writer (who wrote during the war) whos acount is as detailed as his i would love to read it. His source is in my opinion the only one you would need.

The problem with single source is that anyone can write anything they want and get it published. The more sources there are (that at least broadly agree on the subject), the more likely the statements are to be reliable. This is pretty basic stuff, and I believe has been pointed out before. (And as for what "I mean" by reliable sources, please see WP:RS.)
Even if you do rely on a single source only, it needs to be cited wherever you're relying on it for verification. When there is a lot of content without citations, it's impossible for anyone to know whether the information comes from the source cited elsewhere, or is based on the editor's own original research (which is not allowed).
Finally, if you ping me with your replies, I'll know that you've responded; otherwise I don't.
Hope this helps. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:07, 26 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

@DoubleGrazing: Well i did reference him in both the siege of Schleswig and the battle of Jellinge heath. And i want to clarify this is not just a source this is the source on the danish civil war, and it is all written down around the same time, the book which i am referencing is from the 12 century (in Denmark). So the person who wrote this could not just get it published. I can cite more if you want, but all i am writing is practically citation, i read the text, translate it, compress it and then i write it down. The only thing i don't cite is the background part and the aftermath part as i thought one could just look at the main page were everything was relatively clear, but i can put citations there aswell i guess.

Battle of Sejrø moved to draftspace - unsourced

edit

An article you recently created, Battle of Sejrø, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DoubleGrazing (talk) 04:30, 27 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Second Siege of Schleswig has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Second Siege of Schleswig. Thanks! Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:54, 23 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: The battle at Dysiaa (July 9)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AntanO was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AntanO 03:58, 9 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Second Siege of Schleswig (July 10)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zoozaz1 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Zoozaz1 talk 17:55, 10 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Siege of Arkona has been accepted

edit
 
The Siege of Arkona, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

AntanO 05:26, 11 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:The Danish Crusades

edit

  Hello, Marius Kristiansen. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Danish Crusades, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:01, 21 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:The Danish Empire

edit

  Hello, Marius Kristiansen. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Danish Empire, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:01, 21 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:The Danish Crusades

edit
 

Hello, Marius Kristiansen. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Danish Crusades".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 23:23, 20 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:The Danish Empire

edit
 

Hello, Marius Kristiansen. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Danish Empire".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 19:15, 21 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Battle of Sejrø

edit

  Hello, Marius Kristiansen. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Battle of Sejrø, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:02, 27 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Siege of Schleswig

edit

  Hello, Marius Kristiansen. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Siege of Schleswig, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:03, 27 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Battle of Sejrø

edit
 

Hello, Marius Kristiansen. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Battle of Sejrø".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 04:32, 27 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Siege of Schleswig

edit
 

Hello, Marius Kristiansen. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Siege of Schleswig".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 15:09, 27 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:The battle at Dysiaa

edit

  Hello, Marius Kristiansen. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The battle at Dysiaa, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:03, 9 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Second Siege of Schleswig

edit

  Hello, Marius Kristiansen. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Second Siege of Schleswig, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:03, 10 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:The battle at Dysiaa

edit
 

Hello, Marius Kristiansen. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The battle at Dysiaa".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 04:06, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Second Siege of Schleswig

edit
 

Hello, Marius Kristiansen. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Second Siege of Schleswig".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 19:52, 10 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

First Siege of Schleswig moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, First Siege of Schleswig, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~StyyxTalk? 20:52, 6 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:First Siege of Schleswig

edit

  Hello, Marius Kristiansen. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:First Siege of Schleswig, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:01, 21 January 2023 (UTC)Reply