Mark Anthony Molloy

Mark Anthony Molloy's Talk Page

Hi Mark~

：） --ChaoDOU (talk) 11:01, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

Mark Anthony Molloy, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Mark Anthony Molloy! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Osarius (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:16, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

Hello

Welcome to the Wiki project!!! :-) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Beata Steinberg (talk • contribs) 06:29, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Exercise Two

Hi Dennis,

I have critically evaluated KMEHR on the talk page.

I have reviewed :

• PCEHR
• NEHTA
• SNOWMED
• EHR
• Diagnosis Codes

I am hoping to do my wiki page on PCEHR.

Mark Anthony Molloy (talk) 21:58, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

Comments on PCEHR article

This is a very comprehensive article which deals with the contemporary issue of Personally Controlled EHR recently introduced in Australia, and not yet reflected on Wiki. It is well written and it is based on the objective and current information. The article is well structured by its headings, subheadings, bulleted and numbered lists. Most information is well referenced and linked to the internal and external sources/pages. The article would benefit from including further references to some of its sections, for example NASH PKI section, PCEHR JAC ,IAC and IHI sections. Some of the references are not aligned with text, for example references 17 to 20 should be moved just after the text. In the very first paragraph, it would be better to include PCEHR acronym in brackets, and the first heading should read Rationale rather than Rational. Overall, it is a well researched article and it will make a valuable contribution to the Wiki encyclopedia. Beata Steinberg (talk) 08:23, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for your constructive feedback I agree with your comments and will rectify the article in the coming days. Mark Anthony Molloy (talk) 12:08, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Personally Controlled Electronic Health Record, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Shii (tock) 07:10, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Personally Controlled Electronic Health Record, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Coding, Medicare and GP (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:01, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

Peer Review for PCEHR

Wow Mark, I'm really impressed with the detail you placed into this article. I actually, during the summer, helped GPs register for their HPI-I, HPI-O's and NASH keys with NeHTA. I think I may have some registration forms still left over. If you'd like, I can send the forms over to you, for your interest or further reading/input into the PCEHR article.

Anyway, back to the review; the content is remarkably similar to what I've received during the training session with NeHTA, except you covered a lot more than what I was told. It's a very well thought through article with a variety of topics covered in regard to the PCEHR, not much else I can say except that it would be beneficial to maybe provide examples of some vendors or expert systems that are PCEHR compatible or which aren't.

Good work (Y) Vsikiric (talk) 08:30, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Update

Hi everyone, I have implemented all of your recommendations and changes to the article so there are now more references, the ambiguos links have been fixed or removed (the TalkBot asked for that) and a section on Vendors has been included (was going to do this origionally but forgot in the grand scheme so thanks for the reminder Vito) although it's not expansive as I couldn't find too much info on it. Vito I will take you up on your offer of the forms as after putting so much time into this I'm hooked :)

Cheers for the fantastic feedback! Mark Anthony Molloy (talk) 00:34, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

Hi Mark

Yes. i'm enrolled in HIM5IHC . with regards to your article , i do not have issues with your articles i actually admire your work. however , wiki was not allowing me to edit my article and this happened accidentally. i don't understand how and why it happened i think it is some kind of restriction. my apologies for this .

Thanks , Mai

Thanks for the response Mai, I changed the PCEHR back to my version, your article is still in there if you need to retrieve it. You just need to go to the "view history" tab on the PCEHR page and then select he last version you did, you can then copy it and go to the page you wish for it to be on select edit and paste it into the section you want it to be in.

Cheers,

Mark Anthony Molloy (talk) 22:40, 9 June 2013 (UTC)