Markd999

Welcome!

Hello, Markd999, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! bobrayner (talk) 23:08, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 29

Hi. When you recently edited History of Kosovo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Serbian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:10, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Municipalities of Kosovo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gračanica (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:21, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

IMF Country Report No 12/100 reference in Economy of Kosovo

I noticed this because AWB noted an unended <ref> tag. (This specifically is because you half copied The Daily Telegraph ref here.) Your original problem about the cite error "no text was provided for refs named IMF_Country_Report_No_12.2F100" was because your change of "unemployment" to "registered unemployment" (here) removed the "unemployment" text (and the reference definition) from the output as the {{Infobox economy}} template does not have a "registered unemployment=" argument.

As the page is now, I thought it was in too much of a mess of references for me to undo your attempted fixes. (Note the duplicated reference (which is also ignored) has been named "autogenerated3" and is further referenced throughout, whereas the "IMF Country Report No 12/100" name is not referenced outside of these two ignored "references".) I was going to let you, who seems to have some local knowledge, fix it :-) But in writing this summary of issues out I've decided I do know what to do and have fixed it, as well as some other formatting issues. (NB don't put ~~~~ in articles.) You need only check I've not made a blunder.

Specifically, if you want to dispute the "official" unemployment rate, add a referenced note saying that the "real unemployment rate" is higher. Mark Hurd (talk) 01:48, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Republic of Kosovo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gračanica (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

Have some tea

After living four years in Turkey you must have got accustomed to drinking tea. Have some Turkish tea. All the best. --E4024 (talk) 21:29, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

Babam çay çifçitisi Afrikadaydı. Büyüdim çayle inglizce modasında, ama şimdi çay içerim türkçe modasinda. Daha güzeldir.

Turkish classes (free of charge :-): "Babam Afrika'da (çiftçi idi,) çay tarımı yapardı. Ben İngiliz usulü çayla büyüdüm, ama șimdi Türk usulü çay içiyorum; daha güzel..." I congratulate you, you have learned quite a bit; certainly more spoken Turkish than writing, but all the same it is OK. Selamlar. --E4024 (talk) 22:13, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

Kosovo Wines

Wine-making in Kosovo almost certainly has a history as old as in Italy and older than France. It was an important part of the Kosovo economy in the middle ages and in the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia. Production collapsed in the early 1990s, but with privatisation of former Socially-Owned Enterprises from 2006 onwards, quality and quantity of production have resumed an upward trend.

History

Please find the required sources because I think this would probably be an interesting Wiki article!HammerFilmFan (talk) 20:23, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

Wine in Kosovo has a history of around 2000 years. It has historically been centered around the region of Rahovec (Albanian: Rahoveci, Serbian: Orahovec). As elsewhere in Europe, monasteries played an important part in maintaining wine production after the fall of the Roman Empire; the reason why the village of Velika Hoca near Rahovec, with its thirteen Serbian Orthodox Churches, has so many churches is because the monasteries of Kosovo used the village as the administrative center for their wine-producing land-holdings; its vineyards were asigned to a monastery by a Serbian Tsar as early as 1189. The continued existence of the monasteries under the Ottoman Empire contributed to a continuing tradition of wine production.

Under the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia Kosovo wines became a major exporter, especially to Germany, where a bulk sweet red, composed of a mixture of Pinot Noir and Gamay grapes, was a leading brand under the name of Amselfelder (English: "Blackbird Fields" deriving from the Serbian meaning of Kosovo). The collapse of communism in East Germany, followed rapidly by the disintegration of Yugoslavia and UN sanctions against Serbia (then in control of Kosovo) made the loss of this outside market inevitable. In the late 1990s new EU quotas on wine imports from the Balkans also made bulk exports of low-quality wine impossible. The very late privatisation of wine-producing socially-owned enterprises under UNMIK, compared with privatisations elsewhere in South-Eastern Europe also delayed innovation and reform. The combination of all these factors (and also the Serb exodus from the Rahovec area in 1999, since they were usually those who cultivated the vineyards) reduced the area of vineyards from 9,000 hectares in 1989 to 5,000 hectares in 2011, with the state of care also reduced. . Kosovo introduced a Wine Law in 2005and a Wine Institute in 2007 in order to increase quality.

However, Rahovec always produced higher-quality wines as well as bulk ones, which were sought after in the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia. It is claimed by Kosovo wine producers that in Macedonia, to the south, wine tends to be too sweet; in Serbia, it tends to be too acidic.

−==Wine Producers==

A bottle of Stone Castle wine

The largest Kosovo wine producer is Stone Castle , owned by American interests, which resulted from the privatisation of Kosovo's largest wine-producing socially-owned enterprise in 2006. The winery has a production and storage capacity of 50 million litres, which makes it one of the largest wineries in Europe (Tikveš, in Macedonia, claims 55 million litres). Other producers include Iliria and Bodrum i Vjeter, also from the Rahovec Valley. The monastery of Visoki Decani also produces its own wines, albeit in low quantity.

Wine Varieties

The following varieties of grapes are produced in Kosovo:

-Pinot Noir -Gamay -Merlot -Vranec -Semillon -Cabernet Sauvignon -Chardonnay -Rhine Riesling -Riesling Italico

Prospects

Some, albeit a small proportion, of Kosovo wine is already exported. The history of Kosovo wines suggests that a much larger proportion, of higher quality, could be exported in the future: the first private Macedonian wineries, which claim to export 90-95% of their production, started in 1995, eleven years before the first privatisation in Kosovo. On the other hand, the number of current producers is currently very concentrated, which may mean that competition in technology and quality is therefore lower; and labour costs are higher than in Macedonia, which may lead to lower exports . Markd999 Category:Kosovo Category:Wine by country

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/kosovo wines.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
• You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Wywin (talk) 01:17, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

hello

Please watch Talk:Autonomous_Province_of_Kosovo_and_Metohija - thanks.

I have reverted all your edits to Government of Kosovo

I have reverted all of your edits to the Government of Kosovo article. I created this article with the current controversy surrounding Kosovo in mind, with an intent (that IMO is required by Wikipedia community policies) to leave any decision about which is the "real" government up to the readers. Every sentence is or should be supported with a reference given the sensitivity of the subject, and if any claim is controversial is should be identified as such or just plainly left separate from competing or conflicting claims without attempts to reconcile them. I think a quote you deleted (you did not, however, delete the reference but moved the reference to an irrelevant sentence) is enlightening:

“ … countries such as Serbia, the Russian Federation, Cyprus, Greece, Romania, Slovakia, and Spain, and international organizations, which are 'status-neutral', such as the UN, the OSCE, the Council of Europe, NATO, the EU Rule of Law Mission in Kosovo (EULEX) and the European Commission Liasion Office in Kosovo (ECLO) have not recognized the Republic of Kosovo. According to them the institutions of Kosovo are still the 'Provisional Institutions of Self-Government'. ”

The only edits that I think could possibly be viewed as acceptable, namely your inclusion of cabinet members, in my opinion is best kept in the Cabinet of Kosovo article. This article is mainly meant, given the current conflicting assertions of governmental authority, as a disamiguation article. Its current form is a good supporting argument for this proposition: it is already fairly difficult to delineate and differentiate between the competing claims of government and their sources, without going into great detail. If all institutions of each competing government is merged into this article (which should be done if the Cabinet is included), this article will be even more difficult to understand. I hope this won't turn into an all out edit war, like other articles dealing with Kosovo, and you see my intent as neutral and conciliatory. Int21h (talk) 03:22, 16 December 2012 (UTC)

Also note I finally replied to your talk page comments. I am glad to see you actually tried to discuss this before your edits. They probably got caught up with other discussions concerning Kosovo in my Watchlist, which I often ignore given they are way too active and useless for my taste. (But necessary, as Wikipedia probably has a better system of government than any country in the region of Kosovo.)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sir Arthur Lowes Dickinson.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
• You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! The Anonymouse (talk • contribs) ^{[Merry Christmas!]} 17:04, 19 December 2012 (UTC)

Catching up

Hi,
How's it going? I haven't seen you for a while. You did some great work on Kosovo-related topics (despite it being a difficult editing environment). I hope you haven't got tired... bobrayner (talk) 12:53, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

I got very discouraged when a reviewer not only turned down an article entirely unrelated to Kosovo but reverted overnight every single change I had made to the "Kosovo" article over three months. Hope I have now revovered some energy to do more work.

Markd999 (talk) 10:31, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

OK. Sooner or later any editor will hit an obstacle, but obstacles are more frequent around Kosovo! Nonetheless, it's still possible to make progress and improve articles. Sometimes obstacles can be overcome by opening up a discussion and get some outside views from uninvolved editors... (ie. on a noticeboard). It would be a shame to lose you; you did some really great work. bobrayner (talk) 13:39, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

Yes, but I'd quite appreciate some support over current disputes with WhiteWriter and AntiDiskriminator on the "Kosovo" article. And the creator of the "Monuments in Kosovo" article must be feeling quite discouraged (it's not yet a good article but it has potential). I'll submit a "Wines in Kosovo" article (for the second time) quite soon.Markd999 (talk) 00:33, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Names per other wiki articles. Again, use those, please

Usage of several names throughout the article is not ok, and it may be violation of wiki guidelines. Use only article names, as those are most usually agreed by consensus. So, dont use dual/triple names in ordinary articles anymore. Thank you. --WhiteWriter^speaks 17:08, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Call for research participants

Hi Markd999. We are a team of researchers interested in the editing dynamics on different language Wikipedias regarding the topic of Kosovo. We are looking for users who have edited and discussed articles about this topic, and who would be willing to be interviewed for the purpose of this research project. The project is approved by the Wikimedia Foundations´ Research Committee and you can find more information on this meta-wiki page. Research results will be published under open access and your participation would be much appreciated. If you would like to participate you can reach us at interwikiresearch@gmail.com and we will set up an interview in a way that best suits your needs. Pbilic (talk) 11:08, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/kosovo wines concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/kosovo wines, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 16:34, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/kosovo wines

Hello Markd999. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "kosovo wines".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/kosovo wines}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 21:00, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at AfC Arthur Lowes Dickinson was accepted

Sir Arthur Lowes Dickinson, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 00:51, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

More personally, as an administrator re-checking earlier declined AfCs, I need to apologize for the prior reviewing by editors who do not realize that the sourcing was fully adequate and the article totally appropriate. Our practice is that anyone with a full article in either edition of DNB meets the notability requirement. But just as anyone can edit here, anyone can review.

I'm very glad to see that the absurd decline of the AfC didn't stop you from contributing. It very often does have that unfortunate effect. DGG ( talk ) 02:36, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tyrrell baronets, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page King William II (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Markd999. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Markd999. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Markd999. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)