Markus Norse

Norse Atlantic Airways

Hello, please keep in mind Wikipedia's policies and guidelines on conflict of interest and a neutral point of view when editing an article the subject with which you have a professional connection, such as one of an employer. In addition, the draft article for what would later become the existing Norse Atlantic Airways article underwent an AfC (articles for creation) process where it was denied from becoming an article more than once, for reasons arguably including over-reliance on primary sources. Some factual pieces of information such as publicly reported numbers and figures with ownership and shareholding can be reasonably cited using primary sources, but subjective claims and views (such as those made by a CEO or company profile), rather than as secondary commentary by different parties are biased by comparison. The criticism section exists for this type of material between the amount of published material that covers the company's associated criticisms that may lead someone to look up the subject's Wikipedia article, but also covers the different perspectives and associated responses between the company and critics, whether they are politicians, journalists, or potential customers, in a neutral point of view.

Changes in company capitalization or stakeholder proportions over time can be covered in a chronological fashion, with one example article being Jetstar Japan. I mention this because the remarks on current stakeholder amounts and others were superseded on the old ones, and were presented out-of-order when generally sections such as History document developments in a dated fashion over time (remarks are cited as dated, and as new developments occur, new remarks can be cited and accordingly dated more recently).

Some remarks (such as founding date, or developments with unions) also don't necessarily to be repeated across sections; citations can also be aliased using the <ref name="your-text-here">[citation content]</ref> parameter, and using <ref name="your-text-here"/> in subsequent uses, so that the "meat" of citations only needs to be written-in and formatted once, but can be referenced back to so that the size of the page and resultant bandwidth usage is reduced.

Thank you for contributing! ChainChomp2 (talk) 04:49, 8 October 2021 (UTC)