Marshala2036

Welcome!

Hello, Marshala2036, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as John Mark Dougan, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Your first article
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Lklundin (talk) 12:34, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

I have added the cross links and the links to other articles. There is so much more to this story, but I am working on it piece by piece. It's very complicated. Regarding notability, this is a person that fled America to Russia to protect the American rights of Freedom of Speech, to allow American Freedom of Speech. Do you have suggestions? Marshala2036 (talk) 13:01, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

What that article needs isn't links to other articles but reliable third-party sources such as newspapers or reputable magazines that discuss Dougan in some detail - maybe an article in Pravda about his case? You should also keep WP:BLP1E in mind - if one event, fleeing to Russia, is all Dougan is notable for, we probably should not have an article about the person. I rather doubt the YouTube video's reliability, and interviews are not independent coverage anyway. That leaves the article with a single source, not enough to establish notability. Huon (talk) 19:56, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

I am satisfied that Dougan satisfies our notability standard because of significant coverage by the Palm Beach Post (here, here). However these sources need to be incorporated into our article. --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 20:22, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

Ahhh, okay! I get it know. Thank you so much for the direction! It is very late here, but I will make the appropriate changes from your suggestions first thing in the morning!

Marshala2036 (talk) 20:32, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

May 2016

Hello, Marshala2036. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the article John Mark Dougan, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, please:

• avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your circle, your organization, its competitors, projects or products;
• instead propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
• when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
• avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
• exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 17:44, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

Conflict of interest? I've never met this man! I wanted someone to write my first biography and he happens to be the hot topic in Moscow at the moment! Marshala2036 (talk) 19:00, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

The reason I posted the notice about COI is because at File:John Mark Dougan.jpg you wrote that you took the photo. That seems unlikely if you've never met the guy. --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 20:18, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

Yes of course I did. I had to write about someone who I could take the photo of or else the photo would be deleted because the work was not original. I wasn't the only one taking photos during the interview. There was a pretty big croud. I 2anted a selfie but was not able to get it! ;))) Marshala2036 (talk) 20:23, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

@Marshala2036: I see that you added some sources in Russian to the article on John Mark Dougan. Editors with more than one language are a great asset for Wikipedia. So if your Russian is up to it, then you could go to https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:John_Mark_Dougan.jpg and provide a description also in that language. (It's pretty easy, just edit the 'Summary' section and reuse the markup from the existing description in English. The language code for Russian is ru). That way, Russian speakers will be able to better use your photo. All the best, Lklundin (talk) 06:28, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Oh yes! I never thought about editing text, that would be very interesting! I will go provide that Russian text to the photo, but I can certainly do this. Oh, I looked, and it seems very simple. I can do this now. Have a great day and thank you for the wonderful advise!!! In fact I think all the people who have given me advise to make this page. I am excited to do more on this site now. Any requests for biographies? :))) I am in Moscow and have much access to many people.

Marshala2036 (talk) 06:35, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

OK! Let's say that you would like to volunteer to translate from Russian to English. Then you can go to Wikipedia:Translation#Userboxes and copy the userbox (using ru as language) template into your userpage here on the English Wikipedia. That should automatically add you to the pool of translators offering this valuable help. The same page has a second type of userbox, to indicate your willingness to translate in the opposite direction. Good luck! Lklundin (talk) 18:01, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of John Mark Dougan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Mark Dougan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Mark Dougan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 16:09, 21 August 2019 (UTC)