August 2007

edit

  Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Powers and abilities of the Hulk. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Gscshoyru 12:17, 11 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Wonder Woman, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Gscshoyru 12:26, 11 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Marsmanhu reply

edit

Sir, would you please stop harrassing me and reverting my edits. Is this what you do on these pages, revert anyone that makes even the slighest changes to these articles simply because you don't agree with it? Please stop vandalizing my edits.--Marsmanhu 12:31, 11 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

You'll notice that three changes to the articles still stand, one of them slightly controversial, but I'll leave it for now -- the edits I reverted were violations of policy, the ones I left were not. Also... you're most likely a sock of user:JJonz, based on your edits and other socks. If not, I apologize... but the evidence is pretty damning. Gscshoyru 12:36, 11 August 2007 (UTC)Reply
 

This is your last warning.
The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did to Juggernaut (comics), you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Gscshoyru 12:38, 11 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Captain Marvel (DC Comics), you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Gscshoyru 02:33, 15 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

 

This is your last warning.
The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did to Geo-Force, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Gscshoyru 03:22, 15 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Why are you harrassing me??

edit

What's going on with you, why do you repeatedly revert my edits? Do you own these articles or something like that. Please stop being un-civil to me and stop harrassing me or I will report your behavior to an administrator.--Marsmanhu 03:28, 15 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Why am I reverting your POV'd edits? In addition to the fact they are POV, and should not be in wikipedia becasue of this... please see WP:NPOV, I believe you're a sock of user:JJonz, perhaps you should see the report, here. That's why. So I'm keeping an eye on you, and reverting your edits that don't belong in the encyclopedia. Gscshoyru 03:34, 15 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Sockpuppets??

edit

You seem to have some kind of personal vendetta against this JJons or Crysb4 or whoever they are. Do me a favor and leave me out of it, okay?? I don't know you and I don't go around vandalizing these articles. I am simply trying to make some good faith edits on some of these pages. Please stop reverting my edits because you seem to think I'm someone else.--Marsmanhu 03:41, 15 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

I'm not reverting your edits because I think you're someone else. That has nothing to do with my decision. The fact that I think you're someone else makes me watch your edits, I only revert them because they are POV or otherwise disruptive, the edits that you make that are good, I leave. Whether you're a sock or not is besides the point -- you're still making POV'd edits to these articles, and I'd advise you to stop. Gscshoyru 03:44, 15 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Blocked as a sockpuppet

edit
 
 

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of a banned or blocked user. As a blocked or banned user you are not entitled to edit Wikipedia. All of your edits have been reverted.

Details of how to appeal a block can be found at: Wikipedia:Appealing a block. Daniel Case 03:57, 15 August 2007 (UTC)Reply


Daniel Case 03:47, 15 August 2007 (UTC)Reply