MartijnPennings
Test
June 2019
edit
Hello MartijnPennings. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.
Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:MartijnPennings. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=MartijnPennings|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. GSS (talk|c|em) 07:35, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
Response
editI'm not being paid to edit wikipedia, it's just that when something seems to be missing I try to add it as best I can. My experience in IT does make it easier for me to learn wikipedia editing syntax. But I'm not so sure about the non-technical part, i.e. community rules etc. If you have any other questions feel free to ask. Also I was wondering which edit(s) you are referring to? If I knew which edit or aspects you are concerned with that would make it easier to respond. If you think an edit was unbalanced, one-sided or otherwise unwanted, please be more specific.MartijnPennings (talk) 10:16, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
AfC notification: Draft:Bellatrix Aerospace has a new comment
edit
Your submission at Articles for creation: Bellatrix Aerospace has been accepted
edit The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Theroadislong (talk) 16:05, 30 August 2019 (UTC)