Martinogk
Welcome!
|
Adding tags with Page Curation
editPlease take care not to add duplicate tags as you did at Patricia Chou. Thanks. PamD 23:43, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you for fixing the mistake.Martinogk (talk) 03:27, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 1
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited David Heath (probabilist), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Probabilist. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:11, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
November 2015
editHello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Aminta Granera , but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 23:32, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
- The article about Aminta Granera had very limited information, only one reference and some typos. In a sequence of edits of both the English and Spanish version pages, I added key basic information about her and made sure that both articles are properly referenced.
Disambiguation link notification for November 9
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Aminta Granera, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Anastasio Somoza and La Prensa. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:42, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
editThe Barnstar of Diligence | |
Thank you for linking to Charles Coates Walker from the Peace Brigades International article! Willbeaden667 (talk) 13:53, 13 November 2015 (UTC) |
Disambiguation link notification for November 16
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Peace Brigades International, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Willoughby. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 26
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Neernemula, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Paddy and Telugu. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 14
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Balangiga massacre, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Manilla (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 27
editAn automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shared parenting, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Survey (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:39, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 3
editAn automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Child custody (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Visitation
- Families Need Fathers (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Abduction
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 10
editAn automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Fathers' rights movement in Italy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- Fathers' rights movement in Australia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Visitation
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Women in Red
editHi there, Martinogk, and welcome to Women in Red. I see you have already created a number of women's biographies. I hope there will be many more. Please let me know if you run into any trouble or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 10:55, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
- @Ipigott: Thank you for welcoming me. I appreciate that and your offer of assistance. I have more biographies on my to do list so they will be trickling in. Martinogk (talk) 23:40, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
March 2019 at Women in Red
edit March 2019, Volume 5, Issue 3, Numbers 107, 108, 112, 113
Please join us for these virtual events:
| ||
|
Non-existent categories
editBefore adding a category to an article, as you did to Canadian Equal Parenting Council, please make sure that the category page actually exists. In some cases, it may be appropriate to create a new category in accordance with Wikipedia's categorization guidelines, but it is usually better to use the most specific available existing category. It is never appropriate to leave a page categorised in a non-existent category, i.e. one whose link displays in red. Thank you. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 03:00, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
- Dear @BrownHairedGirl: Oops! Your advice is good. Unfortunately, I sometimes make mistakes. Thank you for finding and correcting the error! Very much appreciated. Martinogk (talk) 03:25, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
- No prob, we all mistakes. And on a wiki they are easily fixed.
- However, not all editors know that's a mistake, so I have taken to adding a wee explanation just in case. Hope its tone comes out OK; it's hard to get a single text which works well in all cases. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 03:29, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
- @BrownHairedGirl:Yes, that is the beauty of Wikipedia. I think (i) it is great that you correct the errors and just not complain about them. The latter may push people away from the project. (ii) While it may not be necessary, it is very nice and helpful that you explain your correction on the persons talk page. (iii) It was good that you waited a while before correcting the error, since people do not always do their edits in a logical order. (iv) If you want to work on the tone, you could try the plus/delta feedback approach. Martinogk (talk) 14:08, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
Style
editI know it's not of the greatest importance, but if you do not follow conventions,peoplearegoing to have to spend time changing these: Article and book titles go in Italics, and when speaking about the US Parties, Democrat and Republican have capitals. DGG ( talk ) 01:08, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Canadian Equal Parenting Council for deletion
editA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Canadian Equal Parenting Council is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canadian Equal Parenting Council until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 18:14, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
A page you started (Malin Bergström) has been reviewed!
editThanks for creating Malin Bergström.
I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
You don't need 9 citations for that first claim, one or two will suffice.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
signed, Rosguill talk 21:56, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
- Dear @Rosguill: Thank you for your suggestion. Very helpful. I have fixed the citation style. Martinogk (talk) 00:07, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
A page you started (Thoroddur Bjarnason) has been reviewed!
editThanks for creating Thoroddur Bjarnason.
I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Nice work!
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|MainlyTwelve}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
April editathons at Women in Red
editApril 2019
edit April 2019, Volume 5, Issue 4, Numbers 107, 108, 114, 115, 116, 117
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:00, 25 March 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
(Please excuse this post if it is a duplicate!)
Nomination of Leading Women for Shared Parenting for deletion
editA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Leading Women for Shared Parenting is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leading Women for Shared Parenting until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 16:44, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Elizabeth Celi for deletion
editA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Elizabeth Celi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elizabeth Celi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 17:35, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
May you join this month's editathons from WiR!
edit May 2019, Volume 5, Issue 5, Numbers 107, 108, 118, 119, 120, 121
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:17, 27 April 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Deletion discussion about Molly Olson
editHello, Martinogk,
Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Citrivescence and it's nice to meet you :-)
I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Molly Olson should be deleted. Your comments are welcome over Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Molly Olson .
You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Citrivescence}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
. Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
June events with WIR
edit June 2019, Volume 5, Issue 6, Numbers 107, 108, 122, 123, 124, 125
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:42, 22 May 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
National Parents Organization
editAs I think you know, these days in WP I am much more concerned about promotionalism than notability . dThe mostdifficult type of promotionalism to dea lwith is advocac yfor causes that many people would support. It's very hard to write about them in a NPOV fashion--it's easier to be fair towards our enemies, than maintain a proper critical distance from our friends.
The usual difficulties in writing about sympathetic advocacy organizations is to avoid repeatedly quoting or restating their principles, adding making excessive instances of their successes, aand wording what they are trying to accomplish in a neutral manne,r rather than in words caluclated to sound universally appealing.
I have just reworked National Parents Organization to try to deal with these problems. I hope you will understand that what I have done is what I think would make it a more effective article, not to try to dimish its importance..
We have discussed this before, on my user talk at [1]. with respect to Ned Holstein--as the article had not been improved, I made some rather extensive cuts, removing material which taled not about him, but were examples of the positions he advocates. .
In particular, I have problem with the phrase in this and related articles "those who believe children do best when they have a healthy relationship with both their mother and their father. " This catch phrase is worded to prejudice the issue--those who would oppose shared parenting either in general or in particular instances are likely to believe that the results of a divorce are very apt to be so bitter as to prevent such healthy relationship. (I don't think I have any axe to grind here--I am apparently quite old-fashioned in some ways for someone who considers himself a social libertarian, for I cannot think of a situation among either my relatives or my close friends of a divorce involving children. ) It's easier to look at this objectively when one is not involved. What I think the best way to handle it is to not use such a phrase more than once an article, and if possible, only in a quoted policy statement. "Shared parenting" is I think the neutral phrase. (Need I point out that the earlier term for this was Men's rights, implying that conventional policy in this area was to favor the woman; this is , of course, rather different from the view of most feminist organizations, which have historically been concerned with situations where the bias is in the other direction, in particular the long-standing view that sexually active divorced women are unfit mothers).
Please don't change back what I have done without very careful consideration Rather, consider whether you would do well to make simialr changes in some other of your articles. DGG ( talk ) 08:49, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
July events from Women in Red!
edit July 2019, Volume 5, Issue 7, Numbers 107, 108, 126, 127, 128
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:40, 25 June 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
August 2019 at Women in Red
edit August 2019, Volume 5, Issue 7, Numbers 107, 108, 126, 129, 130, 131
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 06:45, 29 July 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
September 2019 at Women in Red
edit September 2019, Volume 5, Issue 9, Numbers 107, 108, 132, 133, 134, 135
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 16:24, 27 August 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
October Events from Women in Red
edit October 2019, Volume 5, Issue 10, Numbers 107, 108, 137, 138, 139, 140
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:35, 23 September 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
November 2019 at Women in Red
edit November 2019, Volume 5, Issue 11, Numbers 107, 108, 140, 141, 142, 143
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 22:58, 29 October 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
editDecember events with WIR
edit December 2019, Volume 5, Issue 12, Numbers 107, 108, 144, 145, 146, 147
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:43, 25 November 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
January 2020 at Women in Red
edit January 2020, Volume 6, Issue 1, Numbers 146, 148, 149, 150, 151, 153
|
February with Women in Red
edit February 2020, Volume 6, Issue 2, Numbers 150, 151, 152, 154, 155
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 19:31, 28 January 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
March 2020 at Women in Red
edit March 2020, Volume 6, Issue 3, Numbers 150, 151, 156, 157, 158, 159
Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 19:33, 23 February 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
April 2020 at Women in Red
edit April 2020, Volume 6, Issue 4, Numbers 150, 151, 159, 160, 161, 162
Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 14:59, 23 March 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
May 2020 at Women in Red
edit May 2020, Volume 6, Issue 5, Numbers 150, 151, 163, 164, 165, 166
Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 20:59, 29 April 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
June 2020 at Women in Red
editWomen in Red June 2020, Volume 6, Issue 6, Numbers 150, 151, 167, 168, 169
Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 17:11, 25 May 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
July 2020 at Women in Red
editWomen in Red / July 2020, Volume 6, Issue 7, Numbers 150, 151, 170, 171, 172, 173
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 16:11, 28 June 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
August 2020 at Women in Red
editWomen in Red | August 2020, Volume 6, Issue 8, Numbers 150, 151, 173, 174, 175
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:50, 26 July 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
September Women in Red edithons
editWomen in Red | September 2020, Volume 6, Issue 9, Numbers 150, 151, 176, 177
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:51, 29 August 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
October editathons from Women in Red
editWomen in Red | October 2020, Volume 6, Issue 10, Numbers 150, 173, 178, 179
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:10, 21 September 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
November edit-a-thons from Women in Red
editWomen in Red | November 2020, Volume 6, Issue 11, Numbers 150, 173, 178, 180, 181
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:51, 28 October 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
December with Women in Red
editWomen in Red | December 2020, Volume 6, Issue 12, Numbers 150, 173, 178, 182, 183
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:42, 26 November 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
A New Year With Women in Red!
editWomen in Red | January 2021, Volume 7, Issue 1, Numbers 182, 184, 185, 186, 187, 188
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 03:02, 29 December 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
February 2021 at Women in Red
editWomen in Red | February 2021, Volume 7, Issue 2, Numbers 184, 186, 188, 189, 190, 191
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 14:59, 27 January 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
March 2021 at Women in Red
editWomen in Red | March 2021, Volume 7, Issue 3, Numbers 184, 186, 188, 192, 193
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:48, 26 February 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
April editathons from Women in Red
editWomen in Red | April 2021, Volume 7, Issue 4, Numbers 184, 188, 194, 195, 196
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 20:16, 22 March 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
May 2021 at Women in Red
editWomen in Red | May 2021, Volume 7, Issue 5, Numbers 184, 188, 197, 198
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 21:36, 28 April 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
June 2021 at Women in Red
editWomen in Red | June 2021, Volume 7, Issue 6, Numbers 184, 188, 196, 199, 200, 201
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:50, 28 May 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
July 2021 at Women in Red
editWomen in Red | July 2021, Volume 7, Issue 7, Numbers 184, 188, 202, 203, 204, 205
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 16:05, 22 June 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
August Editathons from Women in Red
editWomen in Red | August 2021, Volume 7, Issue 8, Numbers 184, 188, 204, 205, 206, 207
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:26, 23 July 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
September 2021 at Women in Red
editWomen in Red | September 2021, Volume 7, Issue 9, Numbers 184, 188, 204, 205, 207, 208
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 22:30, 26 August 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
October 2021 at Women in Red
editWomen in Red | October 2021, Volume 7, Issue 10, Numbers 184, 188, 209, 210, 211
Special event:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 01:36, 29 September 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
November 2021 at Women in Red
editWomen in Red | November 2021, Volume 7, Issue 11, Numbers 184, 188, 210, 212, 213
|
--Innisfree987 (talk) 21:30, 24 October 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
December 2021 at Women in Red
editWomen in Red | December 2021, Volume 7, Issue 12, Numbers 184, 188, 210, 214, 215, 216
|
--Innisfree987 (talk) 00:12, 27 November 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
January 2022 with Women in Red
editHappy New Year from Women in Red Jan 2022, Vol 8, Issue 1, Nos 214, 216, 217, 218, 219
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:03, 28 December 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
February with Women in Red
edit Women in Red Feb 2022, Vol 8, Issue 2, Nos 214, 217, 220, 221, 222
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:10, 31 January 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
March editathons
editWomen in Red Mar 2022, Vol 8, Issue 3, Nos 214, 217, 222, 223, 224, 225
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:38, 27 February 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
April Editathons from Women in Red
editWomen in Red Apr 2022, Vol 8, Issue 4, Nos 214, 217, 226, 227, 228
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:45, 22 March 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
May Women in Red events
editWomen in Red May 2022, Vol 8, Issue 5, Nos 214, 217, 227, 229, 230
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:53, 30 April 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
June events from Women in Red
editWomen in Red June 2022, Vol 8, Issue 6, Nos 214, 217, 227, 231, 232, 233
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 09:21, 31 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red in July 2022
editWomen in Red July 2022, Vol 8, Issue 7, Nos 214, 217, 234, 235
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:48, 27 June 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red August 2022
editWomen in Red August 2022, Vol 8, Issue 8, Nos 214, 217, 236, 237, 238, 239
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:59, 29 July 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red in September 2022
editWomen in Red September 2022, Vol 8, Issue 9, Nos 214, 217, 240, 241
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:36, 31 August 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red October 2022
editWomen in Red October 2022, Vol 8, Issue 10, Nos 214, 217, 242, 243, 244
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:00, 29 September 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red November 2022
editWomen in Red November 2022, Vol 8, Issue 11, Nos 214, 217, 245, 246, 247
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 17:34, 26 October 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red in December 2022
editWomen in Red December 2022, Vol 8, Issue 12, Nos 214, 217, 248, 249, 250
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:55, 26 November 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red January 2023
editHappy New Year from Women in Red | January 2023, Volume 9, Issue 1, Nos 250, 251, 252, 253, 254
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:02, 27 December 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red in February 2023
edit Women in Red Feb 2023, Vol 9, Iss 2, Nos 251, 252, 255, 256, 257, 259
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:28, 30 January 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red March 2023
edit Women in Red Mar 2023, Vol 9, Iss 3, Nos 251, 252, 258, 259, 260, 261
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 12:54, 26 February 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red April 2023
edit Women in Red Apr 2023, Vol 9, Iss 4, Nos 251, 252, 262, 263, 264, 265, 266
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:53, 27 March 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red May 2023
edit Women in Red May 2023, Vol 9, Iss 5, Nos 251, 252, 267, 268, 269, 270
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:28, 27 April 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red - June 2023
edit Women in Red June 2023, Vol 9, Iss 6, Nos 251, 252, 271, 272, 273
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 09:16, 28 May 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red July 2023
edit Women in Red June 2023, Vol 9, Iss 7, Nos 251, 252, 274, 275, 276
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:43, 27 June 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red 8th Anniversary
editWomen in Red 8th Anniversary | |
In July 2015 around 15.5% of the English Wikipedia's biographies were about women. As of July 2023, 19.61% of the English Wikipedia's biographies are about women. That's a lot of biographies created in the effort to close the gender gap. Happy 8th Anniversary! Join us for some virtual cake and add comments or memories and please keep on editing to close the gap! |
--Lajmmoore (talk) 11:01, 18 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red August 2023
edit Women in Red August 2023, Vol 9, Iss 8, Nos 251, 252, 277, 278, 279, 280
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 19:25, 28 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
September 2023 at Women in Red
edit Women in Red September 2023, Vol 9, Iss 9, Nos 251, 252, 281, 282, 283
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Victuallers (talk) 16:54, 25 August 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red October 2023
edit Women in Red October 2023, Vol 9, Iss 10, Nos 251, 252, 284, 285, 286
See also
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:53, 29 September 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red - November 2023
edit Women in Red November 2023, Vol 9, Iss 11, Nos 251, 252, 287, 288, 289
See also Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 08:22, 26 October 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red December 2023
edit Women in Red December 2023, Vol 9, Iss 12, Nos 251, 252, 290, 291, 292
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:24, 27 November 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red January 2024
editWomen in Red | January 2024, Volume 10, Issue 1, Numbers 291, 293, 294, 295, 296
Announcement
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:17, 28 December 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red February 2024
editWomen in Red | February 2024, Volume 10, Issue 2, Numbers 293, 294, 297, 298
Announcement
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:09, 28 January 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Thank you for participating in Women in Red
editHi there, Martinogk. I am sorry to see you no longer intend to contribute to Women in Red but would like to thank you for the many biographies you created up to early 2019. On the other hand, it's good to see you are happier contributing articles about Nicaragua to the Swedish and Spanish wikis. I take to heart your comments on the problems you encountered in connection with the English version of Wikipedia. Over the years, we have been trying to make the site more welcoming to editors but it has not always been easy. The articles in our Press and Research sections reveal the difficulties we face. Please drop me a line if ever you think I can be of any assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 06:56, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Ipigott: Thank you for your kind words. Much appreciated. Martinogk (talk) 17:14, 1 February 2024 (UTC)