Marxmanster
September 2007
edit
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to 0.999.... Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Oli Filth 21:27, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to 0.999..., you will be blocked from editing. Gscshoyru 21:29, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to 0.999..., you will be blocked from editing. Oli Filth 21:31, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. --TeaDrinker 21:37, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
If you make the same edit once more you will be blocked for WP:3RR --Anthony.bradbury"talk" 21:37, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
- Your edit to 0.999... does not make sense. The first equation you state, c=110c, is true for c=0, but not in the general case, so it is not comparable to the proof stated, however much that proof may be original research (as a modification to a related binary proof in the cited 1910 calculus book by Silvanus Thompson (reprinted 1998). Take the dispute to the talk page, rather than repeately adding nonsense to the article and getting blocked. Edison 21:57, 2 September 2007 (UTC)