Matdepaske

November 2018

Hello, I'm Pichpich. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Pichpich (talk) 15:39, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Luxgen M7. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Caution for reference spam ([1]). - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 15:53, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Luxgen, you may be blocked from editing. Warning for promotion and reference spam (all of your edits here have added promotion for Luxgen and reference spam for "taiwanexcellence.org"...). - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 15:56, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Floquenbeam (talk) 16:30, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

Putting accurate and updated information about LUXGEN is encyclopedic and not promotional. No need to use blatant, deliberate, falsification, illegal, malicious, wrongful suppression of LUXGEN. LUXGEN is more than ready for worldwide customers and sales!!!(Matdepaske (talk) 21:33, 16 November 2018 (UTC)).

• I don't doubt that "LUXGEN is more than ready for worldwide customers and sales", but you'll have to do the selling somewhere else, not here... - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 22:26, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

The statement "LUXGEN is more than ready for worldwide customers and sales!!!" does not imply that LUXGEN is selling on Wikipedia. LUXGEN has never engaged in advertising, promotional or spam on Wikipedia. All contents about LUXGEN on Wikipedia has always been encyclopedic. (Matdepaske (talk) 15:37, 26 November 2018 (UTC))

I disagree entirely. Smells like spam to me. 1292simon (talk) 02:12, 2 December 2018 (UTC)

I disagree entirely. All LUXGEN content is encyclopedic. Even on your own talk page where you welcome others freely to pop a message, you have illegally removed information that clearly shows that LUXGEN is a significant and top 100 most valuable auto brands. Other automakers have listed their information on Wikipedia with sources, yet there is no accusation that they are engaging in advertising, promotion and spamming. Obviously you are somehow biased only against LUXGEN. I perceive that you are aware that LUXGEN is in the same class as Nissan, Mazda, Toyota and Honda but you and others have conspired to make a totally false and biased accusation so as to make sure that LUXGEN does not become a household auto brand. Go LUXGEN, Go LUXGEN, Go LUXGEN, Go LUXGEN, Go LUXGEN, Go!!! https://www.jdpower.com/business/press-releases/jd-power-2018-taiwan-customer-satisfaction-index-csi-study(Matdepaske (talk) 15:43, 3 December 2018 (UTC))