Matheus Damon
Welcome!
editHello, Matheus Damon, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as SWAT Diving Division, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- Your first article
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- Biographies of living persons
- How to write a great article
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Help pages
- Tutorial
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --I am k6ka Talk to me! See what I have done 03:09, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of SWAT Diving Division
edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on SWAT Diving Division, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. --I am k6ka Talk to me! See what I have done 03:09, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
April 2015
edit
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with SWAT Diving Division. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. —teb728 t c 04:40, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with this edit to SWAT Diving Division. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Amaury (talk) 05:17, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did with this edit to SWAT Diving Division. Amaury (talk) 05:50, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Subaquatic World Agency Training
edit If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Subaquatic World Agency Training, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Cahk (talk) 07:38, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of SWAT Diving Division
edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on SWAT Diving Division requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. MadGuy7023 (talk) 15:55, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Swat Diving Division
edit If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Swat Diving Division requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — Bill W. (Talk) (Contrib) (User:Wtwilson3) — 16:23, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
April 2015
edit
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 20:12, 7 April 2015 (UTC)Editing logged out
editI note that you have been continuing your campaign to advertise SWAT from several IP addresses. That's evasion of your block and won't help your cause. You need to understand that your company is not notable and has no place in Wikipedia. This is an encyclopedia, not a vehicle for you to advertise in. All of the agencies in List of diver certification organizations are verified by being recognised by WRSTC or CMAS:
Nobody is interested in a mention of SWAT in WikiHow, which I assume you added yourself. Now stop wasting your time and mine and find somewhere else to do your promotion. --RexxS (talk) 17:36, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
- Dear, you have right in some aspects, but others think it is unfair. Only that I saw many others in my same situation and didn't see anything wrong in doing so. There are many agencies that not belongs to the WRSTC or CMAS and equal are in listing such NASE, ADIP, ANDI, ISE, UTD, RAID, GUE, and some more. I think that they should evaluate the blockade. SWAT Diving Division is founded by my recently, but I've been 50 years in the activity of scuba diving and know deeply about the topic. Because you say that interest anyone? I am being totally honest with you, and of course that I've added in wikihow information. I feel a personal persecution his toward my. Hopefully we can take a decision favorable for both, I look forward to your comments, greetings
- I'm sorry but this isn't a question of "fairness"; it's a question of adhering to the norms that have been established here on Wikipedia. First of all, there is a question of notability, which decides whether an article should exist in its own right on Wikipedia. That requires
"significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject"
as is explained at Wikipedia:Notability. - I agree that some agencies don't belong to WRSTC or CMAS, but we have in the past accepted those that are independently notable, i.e. have a Wikipedia article: NASE, ANDI, UTD, GUE - most of which are members of the EUF (European Underwater Federation). RAID, Rebreather Association of International Divers, is a bit of an edge case, because it is on a list of approved organisations provided by the UK Health & Safety Executive, so has some independent coverage. I agree that ADIP and ISE don't have independent sources, and I've removed them, along with quite a few others that have crept into the list. At the top of the section, when you edit it, there is a notice saying "Please don't add entries to this list unless they have a citation to an independent reliable source". That's really no more than we expect for any claim on Wikipedia, after all anybody can set up a website and make claims - see http://www.metropolis2.com/demo/rex.htm for an example of an utterly unsuitable self-published page. We need our sources to {[tq|"be based on reliable, third-party, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy}} (that's explained at Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources). I'm afraid that WikiHow just doesn't get anywhere close to meeting the standard we need, although I apologise for flippantly saying that "nobody's interested", but I hope you see what I mean.
- So, I'm not being mean to you, and it's nothing personal, but I'm getting fed up of continually reverting your attempts to push SWAT into List of diver certification organizations and a couple of other articles. By all the standards we employ, SWAT doesn't belong in that list, I'm sorry. --RexxS (talk) 20:42, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
- I'm sorry but this isn't a question of "fairness"; it's a question of adhering to the norms that have been established here on Wikipedia. First of all, there is a question of notability, which decides whether an article should exist in its own right on Wikipedia. That requires
Dear, thank you for your answer, is correct. He only commented that none of the companies in the list are non-profit, they are all companies that certify divers and charge for this, only that already have a time in the market. Not to mention the WRSTC charged amounts of money so that agencies appear in your listings...
I ask please tell me that I need to be on the list and not be banned by wikipedia. We apologize for the inconvenience, I insist not to bother, just am a professional of many years in the activity and consider it my major as the others and I want to belong, is as new have to pay certain rights. Thank you and I await the requirements, greetings
- Since SWAT isn't a member of WRSTC, CMAS or EUF, I think that you're going to have to demonstrate that it is sufficiently notable to justify a Wikipedia article of its own. To do that, you need to find several independent, reliable sources that give significant coverage to SWAT. Do you know of any newspapers or scuba magazines that have written articles about SWAT? Have a look at another scuba organisation that has an article on Wikipedia - for example National Academy of Scuba Educators. It just about scrapes through our notability standards: one source where it's mentioned by jobmonkey.com; another is a book (without the page number!); one an article on a diving news website, but it's also a member of EUF, so that probably makes enough third-party coverage for Wikipedia's standards. If you can find that sort of independent coverage, post what you can find here and I'll advise you how to put it together into an article. --RexxS (talk) 21:27, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Dear, thank you very much for your time! You take into account its recommendations and when you have them before uploading any info contact me to know your opinion, greetings!