Your submission at Articles for creation: Mahni Ghorashi (October 29)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DGG were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
DGG ( talk ) 06:00, 29 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Matt123071! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DGG ( talk ) 06:00, 29 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mahni Ghorashi has been accepted

edit
 
Mahni Ghorashi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n! 19:19, 31 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

November 2020

edit

  Hello, I'm Donner60. I noticed that in this edit to Mahni Ghorashi, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 03:46, 14 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Editing Page

edit

Hi Donner thanks so much for reaching out. Trying to correctly cite the page "Mahni Ghorashi" didn't mean to delete your changes that was accidental. How can I correctly add citations that are accurate and remove the "citation needed" error? Thanks a lot for your help!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Matt123071 (talk) 13:54, 14 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

ANI notice

edit

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Mahni Gorashi regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic Mahni Ghorashi. Thank you. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 09:13, 19 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Blocked for sockpuppetry

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Matt123071. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- RoySmith (talk) 01:18, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply