Clearout

edit

I decided just to clear some stuff out, had stuff going back to 2006 on here and random WikiProjects that didn't make sense. --WestJet (talk) 19:58, 2 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Seasons' Greetings

edit
 

...to you and yours, from the Great White North! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 04:13, 24 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

March 2018

edit

I noticed multiple edits that you have made to articles related to the WestJet group of airlines. Please note that not only is your username against our username policy (as you have the same username as the airlines), your edits to articles related to the WestJet group of airlines seem to contravene our paid editing policy and conflict of interest guidelines. Please change your username and adhere to our paid editing policy immediately. In the meanwhile, I have requested that your current username be blocked, as it is blatantly promotional. Please feel free to leave a message on my talk page in case you need any clarification. Thanks, Lourdes 06:05, 4 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

 
Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy or request a change of username.

You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose.

If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page.

You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names. Thank you. -- Ed (Edgar181) 12:02, 4 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

MattBinYYC (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Requested username:

Request reason:

Made this account eons ago, but new policy was put in place, can't be a brand name. Also, the claim about promotional editing/and representing a group is incorrect. I do NOT work for or represent WestJet or have been paid by WestJet to do anything to their pages. The edit I made on WestJet Encore was a grammar and style edit. WestJet (talk) 00:18, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

Accept reason:

Globally renamed 'WestJet' to 'MattBinYYC' and unblocked. Just Chilling (talk) 01:40, 5 March 2018 (UTC)Reply
  • This is the full list of all edits to the WestJet group of articles: [1][2][3][4][5][6] In one diff, you remove an uncited incident from a WestJet article. In another diff, you place a promotional puff about a new service to Glasgow. In one diff, you also have engaged in the talk page giving expert information on the group. If you have no relation to the group, why did you use a name that represents the group and why are you making these edits? Thanks, Lourdes 01:32, 5 March 2018 (UTC)Reply
  • I made the account in about 2006-07 so like when I first discovered Wikipedia & was super into WestJet and aviation. The edit to WestJet Encore which is how this started was a simple style edit. WestJet has always capitalized the J, so it was such a minor edit. 2nd edit was a vandal, 3rd edit was to add the tartan tail to the special liveries section, 4th edit was again a style edit along with the 5th and the 6th edit on the talk page was all the way in 2005 & it's not really "expert" commentary. I was like 16-17. I appreciate where User:Vanguard10 was coming from however, trust me I don't work for them. I'd love to... but I don't. Back in 2005, I don't know if the policy was the same back then, but I really used WestJet as a username on everything including YouTube which the actual airline had to go and request from me. MattBinYYC (talk) 01:49, 5 March 2018 (UTC)Reply
I'll buy that. To avoid future issues, I'll additionally suggest restraining from editing WestJet articles, given the history of your name combined with edits to the articles. This is purely a suggestion and not anything more than that – as any significant future edit to any WestJet related article will come under scrutiny. Thanks, Lourdes 02:29, 5 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Very unfortunate

edit

It is unfortunate that you were blocked. I expressed this before you were blocked by asking an administrator if Wikipedia should look the other way or even change the policy. I can imagine that logging on and find that you have been banned (blocked in Wikipedia lingo) is upsetting. It is even upsetting to me.

The people who formulated the policy may believe that if a username is the same as a company, that means that you are a company employee. That is not true. Furthermore, if one was writing (editing in Wikipedia lingo) nefariously, all they need to do is make up a username not the same as a company. For example, if Petro Canada had a paid employee to write in Wikipedia, instead of choosing User:Petro Canada, they would just have to choose User:SaskatoonSally instead. It may be better for companies to be able to edit openly and have an obvious user name.

If you want to join me to try to change the policy so that you can regain your WestJet user name, let me know and we can, as a group force, try. Vanguard10 (talk) 03:31, 6 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hello Vanguard10, it'll be a waste of time trying to change policy. Till the time Matt hadn't edited WestJet articles, the username would not have been blocked. If one wishes to edit "nefariously" (as you put it) and uses a name that is different than the corporation's name, their editing pattern should give them away (e.g. promotional edits, attempts to blank negative information). Anyway, my suggestion is to just get on with editing rather than attempting to change a tried and tested policy. Thanks, Lourdes 05:06, 6 March 2018 (UTC)Reply
It's all good. As Lourdes pointed out, it was pretty much a blip on the radar because back in 2006 or whenever I signed up, I literally had no idea. I didn't appear on the radar for over a decade of edits before it was caught. I completely understand why they want the username changed, and to be honest it's good to have it be universal on my social media. Once me & Lourdes cleared it up, it was all good. Don't feel bad about it. MattBinYYC (talk) 08:11, 6 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your thread has been archived

edit
 

Hi MattBinYYC! You created a thread called Userbox page is SUPER broken, unsure what to do! at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 5 July 2018 (UTC)Reply


Eurovision Newsletter for June 2019

edit
 

Issue 48

Headlines

At the time of publication the project statistics were as follows
Number of articles Unassessed articles Good articles A-class articles Featured articles Number of members
7263   33   54   1   5   109  

HOMETALKNEWSDESKUNSUBSCRIBEARCHIVES
Published by the Eurovision WikiProject

Sent by ZLEA via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:04, 1 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:Gavin Prout.jpg

edit
 

The file File:Gavin Prout.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 22 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

File:Gavin Prout.jpg listed for discussion

edit
 

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Gavin Prout.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:03, 2 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

National Lacrosse League
added a link pointing to Hamilton
Toronto Rock
added a link pointing to Hamilton

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 11 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your help desk question

edit

Did you find an answer to this question which I just now saw?— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 22:12, 11 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

The WikiEagle - January 2022

edit
 
The WikiEagle
The WikiProject Aviation Newsletter
Volume I — Issue 1
Aviation Project • Project discussion • Members • Assessment • Outreach • The WikiEagle
Announcements
  • After over a decade of silence, the WikiProject Aviation newsletter is making a comeback under the name The WikiEagle. This first issue was sent to all active members of the project and its sub-projects. If you wish to continue receiving The WikiEagle, you can add your username to the mailing list. For now the newsletter only covers general project news and is run by only one editor. If you wish to help or to become a columnist, please let us know. If you have an idea which you believe would improve the newsletter, please share it; suggestions are welcome and encouraged.
  • On 16 December, an RfC was closed which determined theaerodrome.com to be an unreliable source. The website, which is cited over 1,500 articles, mainly on WWI aviation, as of the publishing of this issue.
  • Luft46.com has been added to the list of problematic sources after this discussion.
  • The Jim Lovell article was promoted to Featured Article status on 26 December after being nominated by Hawkeye7.
  • The Raymond Hesselyn article was promoted to Good Article status on 4 December after being nominated by Zawed.
  • The Supermarine Sea King article was promoted to Good Article status on 22 December after being nominated by Amitchell125.
  • The William Hodgson (RAF officer) article was promoted to Good Article status on 26 December after being nominated by Zawed.
Members

New Members

Number of active members: 386. Total number of members: 921.

Closed Discussions


  Featured Article assessment

  Good Article assessment

  Deletion

  Requested moves

Article Statistics
This data reflects values from DMY.
New/Ongoing Discussions

On The Main Page


Did you know...

Discuss & propose changes to The WikiEagle at The WikiEagle talk page. To opt in/out of receiving this news letter, add or remove your username from the mailing list.
Newsletter contributor: ZLEA

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:36, 1 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Bracket editing

edit

I saw you asking on IRC and in the Teahouse about editing the bracket in 2023 Leagues Cup, but did you get a resolution?

The details in the bracket are edited at the separate article 2023 Leagues Cup knockout stage.

The perhaps unfamiliar {{#lst}} template is a synonym for Labeled section transclusion. — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 03:33, 8 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Memo

edit
WikiProject Eurovision


Dear Eurovision Wikipedian,

Our project pages have undergone a full color change and now resemble the Swedish flag  . Content and design updates are taking place daily.

The new Archive tab will make it easier to find and view just about all of our archived pages. It is a work in progress.

Issue 49 of the newsletter is currently pending delivery. While we await that, you can now receive daily and/or weekly Eurovision news updates. Sign up below have a wonderful week.

To receive a daily or weekly Eurovision news update please click on the appropriate button.


Cordially,

News Desk Editor-in-Chief Ktkvtsh (talk)

Ktkvtsh (talk) 05:39, 14 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Loves Sport 2024

edit
  Wiki Loves Sport 2024 - Canadian campaign
The Wiki Loves Sport campaign starts today! This annual campaign aims to improve sport-related content in the Wikimedia projects.

Wikimedia Canada encourages users to create and improve content about Canadian athletes, with a focus on underrepresented communities such as para-athletics, Indigenous groups, women, and sexual minorities.
The campaign runs from July 17 to September 22.

More info and how to join: https://ca.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wiki_Loves_Sport_2024

SophieWMCA (talk) 16:21, 17 July 2024 (UTC)Reply