Mattbrown69

Instead of having an edit war, we should discuss matters on the Talk page for OHP.Iss246 (talk) 23:53, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

MattBrown69, I haven't heard back from you on the OHP talk page. Let's not have an edit war. Let's talk about editing the OHP entry. And YES, I am a psychologist who works and publishes in OHP.Iss246 (talk) 04:17, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

MattBrown69, the expression "OHP researchers and practitioners" is an appropriate term because some occupational health psychologists are researchers and other are practitioners. Still some others are both. I don't know why you insist on writing "occupational health psychologists and researchers." I am an OHP researcher but I am not a practitioner (my Ph.D. is in a subfield of psychology other than I/O). I have colleagues who are practitioners.Iss246 (talk) 02:55, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

Let's discuss potential changes here.Iss246 (talk) 02:55, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

Let's talk about the doctoral programs in OHP. At CSU, a person can come to OHP from I/O or applied psychology or some other area. Ditto Portland State. Consult the articles about the programs. The articles are found in the external links.Iss246 (talk) 23:15, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Mattbrown69, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Mattbrown69! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Jtmorgan (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:17, 6 January 2013 (UTC)