Mattc0805

Speedy deletion of Matt Chadderdon

A tag has been placed on Matt Chadderdon requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  superβεεcat  02:30, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Matt Chadderdon

A tag has been placed on Matt Chadderdon, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. GlobeGores (talk | contribs) 02:32, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Matt Chadderdon

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as Matt Chadderdon, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —Travis^talk 02:40, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

February 2008

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, you will be blocked from editing. —Travis^talk 02:42, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

  jj137 (talk) 00:58, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mattc0805 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I should be able to edit because I believe my post to be appropriate, on regards to Joe DImaggio I have a source to confirm everything I said, but the way I presented it didn't come out quite the way it should've, making maybe inappropriate, I was just expressing facts. I believe I can post constructive edits to Wikipedia and shouldn't be blocked from editing. Also I have come to love Wikipedia and use it for all manners of reports and studies, it is a great website and I should be able to freely among with other users construct an even greater encyclopedia on Wikipedia.

Decline reason:

Really? You have a source to confirm " Dimaggio was found to be homosexual and often he enjoyed a nice analfisting session. Dimaggio also sucked the worlds longest penis measuring in at 17 inches." I doubt it. — Haemo (talk) 02:25, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.