MatthewPWong
Block Notice
 | This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Huon (talk) 15:57, 2 May 2015 (UTC) |
Unblock Me!
MatthewPWong (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
If the evidence says that whoever User:I Love Bridges is and myself are the same person, there is a problem, because I am a new Wikipedian who just joined the site on Friday, and I don't even know who on earth User:I Love Bridges is. Somebody really needs to show me where the evidence is coming from, because it is totally incorrect. MatthewPWong (talk) 20:26, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
Decline reason:
As you should know by now, we don't need hard evidence for WP:DUCK cases of block evasion. Talk page access revoked to avoid wasting further time with you. OhNoitsJamie Talk 21:38, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Also, JamesBWatson, WHY DID YOU BLANK MY USER PAGE? Why can't you place the block notice in a new section underneath or on top of all my content? MatthewPWong (talk) 20:26, 4 May 2015 (UTC)