Wikipedia

User talk:Matthewedwards/Archives/2009/06

< User talk:Matthewedwards | Archives
Latest comment: 15 years ago by Scorpion0422 in topic FLCs
Learn more about this page
Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Images

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Following on from this, just in case you were interested I finished off the image review for List of birds of Maryland. I'm a bit burnt out with images so I'm not sure I'll get round to doing papal tombs one, however I'll try and keep up with the current candidates. Best, Rambo's Revenge (talk) 10:01, 3 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Seeking help in writing more effectively

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I write to you because of your recent edit to WP:Too long; didn't read-- here.

I'm told that I need help in improving my writing. Articles present no problem, but I don't do well enough in talk page venues. I know that this is a non-standard request. I urge you to construe it as just one step in a process of mitigating fundamental flaws in in the way I address issues like logical fallacies or unfounded complaints. Until this week, I theorized that my problems arose when I attempted persuasive writing rather than expository prose, but it's not that simple. An illustrative example of my writing is to be found at Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Tang Dynasty/Proposed decision.

ArbCom remedy

edit

Voting is underway at WP:RfA/Tang Dynasty/Proposed decision.

Proposed ArbCom findings of fact included:

  • 3.2.2 Tenmei and dispute resolution. "... many of Tenmei's talkpage posts and submissions during this arbitration case have been very difficult for other editors to understand, to the point that experienced participants in dispute resolution have had difficulty in following them, despite what we accept as Tenmei's good-faith best efforts to assist us in resolving the case."

ArbCom remedies included:

  • 3.3.2 Tenmei and dispute resolution: "Should Tenmei become involved in any further disputes with other editors, whether concerning the content of articles (beyond ordinary day-to-day editing issues) or more formal dispute resolution procedures, he shall seek the assistance of a volunteer mentor or adviser to work with him in maximizing the value of his presentation by assisting him with formulating it in a clear and civil fashion."
  • 3.3.3 Editors advised: "Editors who encounter difficulties in communicating with others on-wiki are advised to seek help from others in presenting their thoughts clearly, particularly when disputes arise or when dispute resolution is sought."

When I initiated this ArbCom case, my intentions were quite limited, as explained best in my response to John Vandenberg here and as presented initially at WP:RfA/Tang Dynasty#Statement by Tenmei. However, the proposed decision's locus of dispute explains that "evidence in the case has expanded to include other disputes in which Tenmei has been involved."

Backstory

edit

Caspian blue and others have determined that I am Japanese, despite the fact that I have avoided self-labeling in terms of nationality, gender, marital status, etc. I gather that Caspian blue has endured a number of caustic disputes with anonymous contributors and sockpuppets; and many of these were seen to have originated in Japan. Caspian blue is Korean; and aggrieved complaints about perceived anti-Korean bias are commonplace, not only involving those like me with perceived or actual Japanese backgrounds.

As ipso facto "evidence" of my "long-term harassment", Caspian blue alleges here that in 2008 "Tenmei ... attacked my ethnicity and taunted my ancestors ...." Inexplicably, Caspian blue's 2008 complaint at WP:AN/IncidentArchive471#User:Tenmei's abusing AfD and personal attacks did not encompass this specific claim ... which I would have thought implies that it simply didn't happen.

This one example suggests complicated subtexts affecting a broad tranche of wiki-edits. A risk aversion strategy has thus far proven inadequate; and ArbCom is correct in anticipating future difficulties.

I'm guessing that this message to you is arguably the sort of gesture ArbCom wants from me. Perhaps you will construe it as an illustrative example of WP:TLDR.

If you are willing to discuss this off-wiki, I've activated the e-mail send/receive option in my user preferences. If you can think of some other editor I might contact, I'd appreciate it.

Thank you for the time you invested in reading this. --Tenmei (talk) 23:19, 5 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Outline update - Good news and bad news - 06/08/2009

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The big push continues.

And it seems to be working!

The good news is that there's growing support for outlines, and there are more editors than ever editing them!

The bad news is that the complainers are disproportionately represented on the project's various talk pages. While many editors work diligently on the front end, a handful of complainers are trying to tear down the project behind the scenes. Fortunately, barely enough supporters have been watching those pages that no consensus for moving or merging the outlines has succeeded. So far...

Big problem: ignorance of what outlines are for and their benefits

edit

Most of the opposition seems to be unaware of the complete range of what outlines are used for. They just don't get it.

This is why it is important to complete the outline article draft. An article with a comprehensive treatment of outlines would be the perfect place to refer anybody unfamiliar with outlines to.

Opposers also don't seem to understand how outlines differ from some other page type that they prefer. Some think articles are good enough as an overview, others think portals are more in-depth, still others think categories or navigation boxes are the most efficient and useful way to organize and present topical information. Some have simply never seen an "Outline of" page before and think they are a new type of page (they've been around under other names since 2001).

If you run across anyone who doesn't understand the role of outlines on Wikipedia, Wikipedia:Why do we have outlines in addition to...? might help reduce their misconceptions or uncertainties about outlines.

On the bright side, you've got to see this...

edit

To add the outlines and related support pages to your watchlist (takes less than 30 seconds), cut and paste them from Wikipedia:WikiProject Outline of knowledge/Watchlist into your raw watchlist. For a way to improve the display of your watchlist - by namespace (very useful) - see Watchlist sorter, or use the "super fast upgrade" at WP:OTS.

Or go to Wikipedia:WikiProject Outline of knowledge/Watchlist using Related changes (currently without the talk pages) and click on "Related changes" in the toolbox menu on the sidebar on the left side of your screen.

The big push

edit

The big push started with about a thousand banners and notices being placed on article talk pages all over Wikipedia.

But it didn't stop there...

Welcome our new members...

edit

The following Wikipedians have joined the OOK team.

Be sure to stop by their talk pages and introduce yourselves.

Enter the mentors!

edit

I asked a bunch of mentors at WP:ADOPT for advice. Several of them answered on my talk page. Most of those who replied were happy to help, and posted some very good ideas. A couple even joined the project.

Here are their ideas, and what is being done about them. A few of the tasks still need volunteers:

Linking to outlines has begun

edit

To the tops of about 30 subject articles, I placed a test batch of hatnotes leading to the corresponding outlines. The hatnotes look like this:

For a topical guide to this subject, see Outline of X.(Hidden: <!- PLEASE LEAVE THIS LINE IN PLACE because it leads to the page that serves as the table of contents for Wikipedia's overall coverage of this subject. Thank you.-->

The rationale for the hatnotes is that each outline is a topical guide for its subject, and since tables of contents go at the front of a book, a link to each outline should be placed at the front of its subject.

Unfortunately, not all editors agree. Some of the hatnotes have already disappeared.  :(

Some past discussions pertaining to the existence or location of outlines

edit

Note that the "Lists of topics" are of two types, including outlines and indexes, so discussions to remove, move, or merge those are usually relevant to the OOK. Also, outlines are a type of list, so discussions that affect lists in general also pertain to outlines. We've got to be on our toes!

I've excluded links to live discussions, out of respect for WP:CANVASS.

edit

Here's a directory of outline support pages:

Keep up the great work!

edit

The Transhumanist    04:26, 8 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

WPOOK advert banner under development, here's the beta...

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Thank you to those who suggested WPOOK have an animated advert banner. Penubag got working on it right away. Here's what he's come up with so far:

Penubag needs feedback.

I've posted a few changes for him to make to it.

Please post additional comments and suggestions for him at User talk:Penubag#Chocolate banner.

Thank you.

The Transhumanist    02:38, 9 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Outline collaboration!

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

As you know, Penubag is working on a banner to advertise the Outline WikiProject. And he's almost done.

The banner prominently presents the "Outline of chocolate", which of course will become the most widely advertised outline as soon as the banner goes live. The first thing many editors will do after seeing the banner is look for that outline.

The problem is, we don't have one.

So that's our first outline collaboration!

I started a draft this morning.

It needs to be finished and moved to the article namespace before we can start using Penubag's banner ad!

Come join in on the fun. It's chocolate!

The Transhumanist    22:00, 9 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

WikiCup Newsletter XIX and XX

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Delivered by The Helpful Bot at 21:58, 13 June 2009 (UTC) for the WikiCup. To report errors, please leave a message on the talk page.Reply

I have no home internet access

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago6 comments3 people in discussion

Something's happening with the service provider that gives our apartment buildings TV and internet. It's going to be off for at least a week, maybe as long as two. I won't be able to do anything, and that includes FLC closures, etc. Matthewedwards :  Chat  19:30, 11 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Let me know if I can do anything. The Rambling Man (talk) 19:31, 11 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
Thank you. Maybe Scorpion would like some help at FLC? Since you used to do it, it should be okay. I don't think there's anything else though. Thank you for offering. I'm going now, but I'll try to get to the library at some point. Matthewedwards :  Chat  19:36, 11 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
I'm sure he'll cope. But by all means let him know that I'm available if and when required. Take it easy. The Rambling Man (talk) 19:38, 11 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
Darn. Hope you get back online soon. Cheers, Dabomb87 (talk) 13:26, 12 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
Just checking in. I am at the library for an hour. Still no internet at home. Matthewedwards :  Chat  02:03, 16 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Law & Order: Criminal Intent (season 1)

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
 

I have now been able to pass Law & Order: Criminal Intent (season 1). Congratulations. It was nice to work with you.

Apologies for the delay; because there was no rush I wanted to spend more time tweaking the prose. I have made a considerable amount of edits to the article, and I hope that you will agree with the majority of them. Of course, please revert anything that is not good.

Please see the new section that I have added to the talk page, Talk:Law & Order: Criminal Intent (season 1)#Suggestions for further improvement.

I think that it is inherently difficult to write neutral articles on TV series, perhaps partly because the nature of sources is likely to be dramatic in tone and in-universe. I'd love to see this become an FA one day, and I do feel that it has the potential; perhaps the main part to work on improving would be the plot summaries. It would be great to have another exemplary article on a TV season.

I hope that you get your internet repaired soon; if there are any questions about my comments or edits, then do of course ask me.

Once again, congratulations, and keep up the good stuff.  Chzz  ►  10:50, 12 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. I'll take a look at your suggestions and implement them when I get full access back. Matthewedwards :  Chat  02:04, 16 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Looking for a WikipediA author

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Mathew,

I had trouble finding a discussion area on this site that this topic would be appropriate for but no luck.

Since you are very active I thought you may know who I can talk to.

I would like a non biased entry on WikiPediA on our company and what we do. One that conforms to the guidelines and is well written. We would like to have the details regarding LOGICBit posted here. We have been around since 1994 and since 1996 online.

Is there anyone you know that would accept such a project. We would gladly pay the writer for his/her time. I don't think anyone on my staff could write an unbiased entry without sounding like some sort of sales pitch. I sure can't.

Any help in this regard would be much appreciated.

No response necessary if this post is inappropriate and if so I apologize.

Frank Rivera LOGICBit Science and Technology Corporation

Logicbit (talk) 21:29, 12 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Sorry. I don't know what you're talking about. Did I delete an article you wrote, perhaps? I can't really look into it, perhaps you could find another admin who may help you? Try User:Juliancolton? Matthewedwards :  Chat  02:05, 16 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

WPOOK's advert banner is done!

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

Is it perfect? Can it be improved?

Penubag loves feedback. Please let him know if it can be further improved.

Thank you.

The Transhumanist    23:12, 15 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Outline update - Full Steam Ahead! - 06/18/2009

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Several members of the WikiProject have been hard at work.

Buaidh has been building and refining the outlines on the U.S. States, the states' historical outlines, and the Historical outline of the United States. Lately, his edits have dominated the project's watchlist readout. (I think he's overdue for a barnstar or two. hint hint)

Penubag has been working on medals for all the main branches of the OOK, and has completed the OOK WikiProject's animated advert banner (see below).

Highfields has been filling in the currencies for each country on their respective outlines.

NuclearWarfare and Thehelpfulone have been busy with WP:AWB, posting banners and notices, and helping our sister project, the Index WikiProject, get established. Indexes work hand-in-hand with the outlines and are prominently linked to from the top of most of them. And the outlines, which serve as tables of contents, are only as good as the pages they link to.

Since we started integrating (linking) the OOK and its support pages into the encyclopedia and into the Wikipedia community, activity on outlines has been increasing. Though there's still much left to do.

But I digress. There are a couple more...

Welcome our new members! Stefan and MacMed

edit

Stefan is building the Outline of sharks.

MacMed has joined our advanced wiki-tools team, and is currently adding links to outlines in the corresponding subject articles' see also sections.

Be sure to stop by their talk pages and say "hi".

WPOOK's advert banner has gone live!

edit

Penubag has finished this WikiProject's animated advert banner, and it is now being displayed on the Wikipedia ads template which in turn is displayed on about 2000 user pages. Each time someone access one of those pages, there is a 1 in 184 chance of them viewing this:

 
Wikipedia adsfile info – #184

If you'd like to display the banner on your userpage locked-on to the ad as above, use the following code:

{{Wikipedia ads|ad=184}}

(By the way, it's been awhile since we've barnstarred Penubag).

Watchers needed!

edit

If you haven't already, please add the entire project's watchlist to your watchlist. Here's how:

From the edit window, copy and paste Wikipedia:WikiProject Outline of knowledge/Watchlist into your raw watchlist.
Or go to Wikipedia:WikiProject Outline of knowledge/Watchlist using Related changes and click on "Related changes" in the toolbox menu in Wikipedia's sidebar on the left hand side of the screen.

Check the watchlist every time you log on!

edit

I forgot to mention this step above.  :)

The OOK is in 5 other Wikipedias?

edit

I can't make heads or tails of 'em, but these links were on Portal:Contents/Outline of knowledge:

Resurrected from the grave yard...

edit

I discovered an AfD discussion on possibly the first article named "Outline of", which was called Outline of Islamic and Muslim related topics, and which was created 4 years ago. Of course they deleted it. But now it has many friends, and so it has risen from the dead.  :)

See the DRV discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2009 June 7#Outline of Islamic and Muslim related topics.

A diamond buried in project space

edit

Recruiting

edit

Recruiters needed. Drop me a note if you are interested.

Advice from the mentors

edit
  • Astatine-210, Strdst grl, and Willscrlt - link to the outlines from the corresponding subject articles' see also sections - this is underway by MacMed (non-country outlines) and User talk:NuclearWarfare (counry outlines).
  • Astatine-210 - add a link to the outlines to the disambiguation pages of the corresponding subjects - good idea. Since "Outline" is just the type of page, not the subject, I think these might qualify for inclusion on disambiguation pages. We need someone to look into the relevant guidelines on this.
  • SimonTrew - provide a badge (userbox) for WPOOK members to add to their user pages - Penubag will have one for us soon.
  • Zachary crimsonwolf - create a card explaining outlines, and send it to everyone you know, and make it viral (by including a request for the recipients to send the card to everyone they know) - this task has been split in three:
  1. Creation of a "thank you for your interest" card which introduces (explains) outlines, to send to queriers, new participants to discussions, those who seem to be confused about outlines, etc.
  2. Creation of a thank you card / invitation to the WPOOK, to send to users we see working on outlines, including a request for them to invite others whom they think might be interested
3. Creation of an invitation to Wikignomes, with a brief rundown on the types of tasks there are for them to do on the outlines. The invitation will include a request for them to invite anyone they think would enjoy working on outlines.
  • weebiloobil - add examples to Wikipedia:Outlines - more examples will be added as suitable outlines are completed
  • weebiloobil - add a picture to Wikipedia:Outlines (it doesn't have to be relevant), to provide atmosphere and to break it up visually and add a splash of color - will do, and we'll add a caption to make it relevant, with a link to the outline on that subject. Thank you for the idea.
  • Zachary crimsonwolf - ask Jimbo Wales to bestow the award(s) for the country outlines contest, once you get it going first - we'll give that a try
  • Zachary crimsonwolf - ask everyone in the project to inform their acquaintances around Wikipedia about the OOK - will do, as soon as the cards
  • UzEE - collaborate with all the WikiProjects you share scope with - we've placed a banner on their talk pages, and have placed task notices on some. We'll be posting more tasks, and plan to create a section on contents system development and maintenance for each WikiProject page itself.
  • SriMesh - if you can't get outlines added to next year's WikiCup, then create your own WikiCup-like contest - there's 6 months left to this year to address reservations and work out the details at WikiCup. In the meantime, there's the 200-WikiProject contest, which needs input.

More outline tasks

edit

New outlines in article space

edit

New outline drafts

edit

Main discussion pages

edit

Keep up the great work

edit

I'm impressed with the level of enthusiasm and work going into the outlines. I'm proud to be working with each of you.

The Transhumanist    23:24, 18 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Outline collaboration #2: Outline of Gibraltar

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This outline is approaching completion.

I added a bunch more links, finding them with the following Google site-specific searches of Wikipedia:

(You can use the wikicode for the links above as the basis for new searches - just replace "Gibraltar" with any other country or region name).

Request: please redirect the redlinks! (bluelinking...)

edit

The redlinks need to be bluelinked where possible. The most useful way is to create redirects leading to the material (which is usually included in a section of an article - see Wikipedia:Redirect#Redirects to page sections. That way, when the redirect pages are replaced by the actual articles, the links will already point to the right places.

Please take a crack at it, and bluelink a few.

Thank you.

Good luck.

Have fun.

The Transhumanist    01:08, 23 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

P.S.: on an unrelated matter, where should the Outline of chocolate be placed on the OOK? -TT

I finally got to whack somebody with a trout!

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

That was fun.  :)

The Transhumanist    23:58, 23 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Outline update - Push push push - 06/25/2009

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Work is proceeding apace...

New members
Hatnotes

The current consensus is that we can't place a hatnote leading to an outline at the top of a subject articles unless the outline being presented is of at least the same quality-level as the article.

What's next...

Improve outline quality by completing them.

Place hatnotes for the outlines of high enough quality.

Guidelines pertaining to outlines need to be updated. Outlines emerged as a class of pages only a few months ago, and most of the relevant guidelines don't cover them specifically. For example, Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists is incredibly out of date.

Invite wikignomes, wikielves, and wikifairies (all 2500+ of them) to help on the outlines .

Identify 600 more subjects with coverage extensive enough to justify outlines, create rudimentary drafts for them, and post notices to the corresponding WikiProjects and subject talk pages to help build them.

Convert outlines titled "List of" to outline articles, and add them to the OOK. There are a few hundred of these. Conversion instructions are needed.

Add a description of outlines to About Wikipedia and Wikipedia:Basic navigation, and add tips about outlines to the WP:TOTD and Tips library.

Keep up the great work!

The Transhumanist    20:27, 25 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Amazing Race Wikipedia

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

Hello, Matthewedwards. Welcome to the Amazing Race Wikipedia. In your travels, you will encounter two types of tasks. In a Detour, you have a choice between two tasks. Both of you must work together on this. In a Roadblock, one team member must work on a task alone. Your Amazing Race Wikipedia submissions page is located here. Enjoy the competition! Best, Shappy (talk · contribs) and Firestorm (talk · contribs). 19:53, 16 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Has it started, then? What exactly are we supposed to do? I can't find any rules anywhere and since I've never watched the TV show I can't even guess. Matthewedwards :  Chat  23:10, 18 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
The race starts on July 1. If you read the submissions page and re-read the above message (it has the types of tasks you will encounter), you should be OK to start. :-) Meetare Shappy Cunkelfratz! 23:12, 18 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
Ah. I hadn't looked at the submissions page. Thanks Matthewedwards :  Chat  23:14, 18 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

WikiCup Newsletter XXI

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Delivered by The Helpful Bot at 22:30, 22 June 2009 (UTC) for the WikiCup. To report errors, please leave a message on the talk page.Reply

FLC

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi Matty, I haven't talked to you in a while, but I've been pondering my future with FLC. I admit that I am a little, for lack of a better word, burned out on FLC but I would like to stay on as director. However, I will be gone at least 5 (non-consecutive) weeks in the Summer, then in the Fall I'll have considerably less time to edit. Since you have been having computer problems, I thought it would be useful to appoint either a) a delegate or preferably b) a co-co-director (since in FLC, a director and delegate are pretty much the same thing, although some users may say we don't need 3 directors, so a delegate would be a way around that). I would stay on as a director (because I will still be here several weeks in the summer) but this way, there will be a user to help you out in the Summer, and to take over for me, should I become too swamped with school in the fall. I just wanted to get your opinion (and could you please respond on my talk page?) Thanks, Scorpion0422 21:04, 23 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

I'll pop on IRC real quick. Matthewedwards :  Chat  21:07, 23 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of New York Yankees managers/archive1

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Uhh...Matthew, there are still comments that hasn't been resolved in this nomination. You didn't pass one of my nominations when it had only one comment...:( -- [[SRE.K.A.L.|L.A.K.ERS]] 23:04, 27 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Ooops. That was by accident. I've added it back into FLC Matthewedwards :  Chat  23:16, 27 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

New closures

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago7 comments4 people in discussion

I noticed that you closed some of the FLC's tonight and I noticed that one as the List of Jewish Medal of Honor recipients. It did not say however if the list was promoted or declined and I haven't seen anything update so I thought I would ask. --Kumioko (talk) 23:49, 27 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Check the featured list logs if you are unsure. In this case it was promoted. Rambo's Revenge (talk) 23:53, 27 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
You haven't updated the closure log. Also, why was Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Ambassadors of Russia to Austria/archive1 promoted? It didn't seem to get that many reviews, and I still had an unresolved question. Dabomb87 (talk) 02:37, 28 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
You mean WP:FLL? Yeah I did. Sorry about the Ambassador list. I read through the list and the FLC and didn't notice that the sorting hadn't been done. I had each FLC that I was going to close open for well over an hour, so its likely that I missed your 9:34 pm (UTC) edit. The same thing happened with the NY Yankees FLC mentioned above. I'll add the sort and center the columns myself if you want? Matthewedwards :  Chat  21:10, 28 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
Yes, and thanks. Have you updated the closure log (sorry to be such a nag)? Dabomb87 (talk) 21:35, 28 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
Oh, you mean the thing on WT:FLC. No, I totally forgot. I'll do it sometime today though. Matthewedwards :  Chat  21:52, 28 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
OK, no hurry. Sorry for being unclear; I should have provided a link. Dabomb87 (talk) 23:46, 28 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

WikiCup Newsletter XXII

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Delivered for the WikiCup by  ROBOTIC GARDEN  at 21:50, 28 June 2009 (UTC). To report errors see the talk page.Reply

Request for feedback

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Minnecologies has done an incredible amount of work on Outline of forestry and posted a note to me on my talk page requesting feedback.

I've posted my observations at Talk:Outline of forestry#Finished outline review.

Please take a look at the outline and let Minnecologies know what you think of it on the outline's talk page.

Thank you.

The Transhumanist    19:37, 29 June 2009 (UTC) Delivered by JCbot (talk) at 20:15, 29 June 2009 (UTC).Reply

Amazing Race Wikipedia Starts!

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello, Shappy. This is a reminder that Amazing Race Wikipedia will start very soon. At 00.00 (or whereabouts), our host Firestorm will place the first Detour on your submissions page. Again, the Detour is a choice between two tasks; both members of the team choose one task and work together to complete it. A Roadblock is a task only one team member must perform; he/she may not have any help from the other team member. Good luck and enjoy the Race! :-) Shappy (talk · contribs) and Firestorm (talk · contribs) --EdwardsBot (talk) 13:33, 30 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

FLCs

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago3 comments1 person in discussion

Hi Matty, this is just a heads up that I will be going away tomorrow for a week (I'll be back on the seventh). I'll also be going away July 20 - August 11, and at least one more week in August, as well as several random days and weekends in between. Also, when doing closures, remember to update the closure log. I find that a lot of reviewers do pay attention to it, and it makes your closure decisions a lot clearer. Have fun, Scorpion0422 15:51, 29 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Also, if my two current FLCs - List of Olympic medalists in snowboarding and List of 2006 Winter Olympics medal winners - receive any opposition or concerns requiring major work, could you please leave them open until I return? There is a user who will address the minor ones, and if you feel they are promotable, then please do so (and don't bother to wait). Thanks, Scorpion0422 20:47, 29 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Psst... Don't forget the closure log. See you in a week. -- Scorpion0422 15:37, 30 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Matthewedwards/Archives/2009/06&oldid=1146675000"