February 2009

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page The sutherland inquiry has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Techman224Talk 00:12, 3 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

  The recent edit you made to the page The sutherland inquiry constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Techman224Talk 00:12, 3 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for deleting that, I realise that I should use the Sandbox and in future that's what I'll do. However, as a good-faith edit, my incomplete page did not constitute vandalism. Mattjuden (talk) 14:33, 14 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Scholarships for Kids

edit
 

The article Scholarships for Kids has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No significant coverage to meet WP:ORG. 2 of its 3 sources are primary. Also an orphan

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 8 February 2023 (UTC)Reply