MausKappetijn
This is MausKappetijn's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: F1Maximaal (December 12)
edit- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:F1Maximaal and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:F1Maximaal, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Hello, MausKappetijn!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 01:52, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
|
Speedy deletion nomination of F1Maximaal
editIf this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on F1Maximaal requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. – NJD-DE (talk) 16:02, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
January 2022
editHello MausKappetijn. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to F1Maximaal, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.
Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:MausKappetijn. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=MausKappetijn|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}
. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. – NJD-DE (talk) 16:07, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
--MausKappetijn (talk) 16:24, 30 January 2022 (UTC)Reply: Hi, actually I'm just a Dutch motorsport fan and I figured there was not a page yet for F1Maximaal, which is why I created one. I'm not being paid to do so, or anything like that. I don't have any other interests than contributing to the Wikipedia mainspace for the topics I'm interested in. MausKappetijn (talk) 16:24, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Special:Permalink/1059851612:
The role of Editor-in-Chief at F1Maximaal is currently fulfilled by four managing editors, namely Christian Moerman, Rick Pasker, Maurits Kappetijn and Terrence Riepema
. It appears you do have a connection with that site. – NJD-DE (talk) 16:30, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Reply: Oh, I totally understand the confusion! The name is common in Dutch and it is not me (I wish I am though), it is also not family of mine.
--Sleevezipperr (talk) 16:36, 30 January 2022 (UTC)Hello, I just saw this discussion since I moved the page this afternoon and wanted to check in. I am Dutch too and can confirm that the surname is common, so it may be a coincidence. I won't interfere with any decision-making on this though, sorry.
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Bbb23 (talk) 19:31, 30 January 2022 (UTC)