Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5

L'Engle fictional locations

I think that an article about Fictional locations in the works of Madeleine L'Engle is a great idea! You might want to look at similar articles (say List of places in The Chronicles of Narnia or Islands of Earthsea), though since your article would cover different though intersecting series, it might have to be structured a little differently. I don't see any reason why the article should be a problem, but if anyone does propose it for deletion, let me know and I will be happy to defend it. RandomCritic 13:21, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

James Thurber Article

The revision is wrong he is related to Thurber. You should have just taken out the extra information. I agree with your message and think it is a good idea to move it down to a better area.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Nyankzfan13 (talkcontribs) 23:04, 6 December 2006 (UTC).

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter: Issue VII - December 2006

The December 2006 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 23:44, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

Reply

A Wrinkle in Time (film) needs a source that exists: I'm not doubting it exists, but articles on Wikipedia need sources. An official site or a page on Internet Movie Database (IMDB) will work. RobJ1981 05:57, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Good job on all the edits to the article. I changed it's rating to start. It's pretty close to B class (in my opinion at least), but not quite. RobJ1981 17:05, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Smile

I clicked on your username from my watchlist and when that picture loaded I jumped. Really. Thanks for the help. --Justanother 02:18, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

Christmas tree

Hi Karen - thanks for the note! I'd not worry too much about needing a citation for it, as it is pretty self-evident that artificial trees don't have bugs on; citations aren't required for what one could call common knowledge. Actually better that way than giving a citation, as any such citation would very likely come from a company promoting and selling artificial trees, and we obviously don't want such commercial advertising appearing on the page. I'll think of some suitable wording to add (likely tomorrow as it's getting late here). Happy Christmas! - MPF 00:06, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

The fisherman vandal

Generally adding a "hoax" tag to an articel will result in something happening, as they will either be found true and fixed up, or found to be totally fraudulent and shot. EG. the only reason I saw either of those "articels" was because they were in CAT:HOAX and blatantly unsuitable. I don't know if the CSD will work (Hoaxes have to be really bad to get deleted quickly (EG. "Texan nuclear")), but if nothing else they wont fall out of scrutiny untill they're at least proven true or gone.

If you want something metapedian to try and "be bold" with (I'm not reccomending it, only suggesting), you can try Category:Copied and pasted articles and sections. Removing text obviously copied from a copyrighted site is encouraged, even if it does occasionally get accedentally reverted as vandalism. 68.39.174.238 08:20, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Tucson Toros Memorabilia

I noticed your great early 90's Toros pictures. I was wondering if you had any equipment used by Tony Eusebio in your collection? Cjosefy 14:28, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Back to the Future "Speculation"

Could you explain why you reverted this addition?

"It is implied that "the Libyans" statement was not filmed with Marty, and neither is the souce of the Plutonium, which Doc states earlier in the demonstration film. However, earlier in the film, Marty can be seen filming both segments and no mention of damage to the film is made"

If you watch the movie, the Doc in 1955 is unaware that the plutonium was given by the Libyans, or that the Libyans have found him before Marty gets in the car and goes back to 1955. Doc keeps pausing and rewinding the section of Martys clip "they found me", as if he is trying to figure out who found him. But Docs statement "the Libyans" was taped by Marty in 1985, so was Docs explaination that he got the plutonium from the Libyans.

This is a factual error in the movie and not my speculation or opinion.

PS: You have to watch the movie and be looking for the error to catch this detail. Watch what Marty tapes in 1985 and watch what the Doc watches and seems to not be able to watch in 1955. Rewt241

Magoo

Thanks for your work on the Christmas Carol article. I've become a pretty heavy dabbler in wikipedia (addicted?) now, but this is the closest I've come to feeling we are actually working together, in generally the same direction... The main thing I can think of to improve the article now would be cover art for each of the different editions (I've never done that, not sure how) -- and maybe some real info about the DVD extras, or at least links to such. Guess I'll have to buy the DVD. My next big project is to create a Stingiest Man in Town article -- I grew up listening to that soundtrack LP, and a reel-to-reel copy of the Magoo soundtrack. After I note the details of the ads (Timex?) that I have on the reel-to-reel audio, I'll have to figure out if there is any proper way to add them -- Trivia? Season's greetings from Boston MA! 69.87.203.132 21:13, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

Time Quartet

Yes, I think you're right. The userbox I requested doesn't really suit a series of novels. My apologies there. You seem to have done a great job with using the series userbox all the same. -- Longhair\talk 09:25, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter: Issue VII - December 2006

The January 2007 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 19:56, 4 January 2007 (UTC)