Max moa

‎List of Megafauna

Hi and welcome to Wikipedia. As you wrote in your edit summary, this list is going to be about YOUR OWN definitions - which is clearly not tolerated on Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not for publishing your original research or what you personally think is right. Neither is it appropriate to ask other editors not to change your article. So, instead of creating a redundant list that will most likely be deleted, you should rather add species to the megafauna article. De728631 (talk) 13:57, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, that slipped my mind. I usually use those definitions. I'll fix my problems, for I know an article like this had been requested by few.

Alright, but I still think it'll be redundant to the existing megafauna article. Anyhow, I'm interested in seeing how this turns out. Good luck and happy editing :) De728631 (talk) 14:05, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

Thank you. I'll keep my definitions to myself, but I will not post them.

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 01:32, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Oh, I'm sorry. I was just wondering how to do that.

Nomination of The Marshall Illustrated Encyclopedia of Dinosaurs and Prehistoric Animals for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Marshall Illustrated Encyclopedia of Dinosaurs and Prehistoric Animals is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Marshall Illustrated Encyclopedia of Dinosaurs and Prehistoric Animals until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Hemiauchenia (talk) 19:52, 7 November 2021 (UTC)