Maxboost08
June 22, 2017
editPlease refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Tom (North Shoreman) (talk) 16:08, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
June 2017
editYour recent editing history at Modern display of the Confederate flag shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Tom (North Shoreman) (talk) 16:12, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
Maxboost08, you are invited to the Teahouse!
editHi Maxboost08! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 22:02, 22 June 2017 (UTC) |
June 2017
editHello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at Talk:Modern display of the Confederate flag, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
- Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
- With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Additionally, please note that personal attacks are not acceptable anywhere on Wikipedia. SummerPhDv2.0 21:27, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
July 2020
editYou may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia. El_C 04:32, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
- Why? The description is inaccurate. What is wrong with you? Maxboost08 (talk) 04:34, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
- You have placed the article into a state of disrepair. Please proofread better. And no original research, please. El_C 04:39, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
August 2020
editYou may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use talk pages for inappropriate discussions. Acroterion (talk) 00:19, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
Important Notice
editThis is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Blocked
edit{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.