Maxcor

Regarding edits made during January 7 2007 (UTC) to User:Firefoxman

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. ¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 00:23, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Maxcor: I'm really really sorry. I don't mean that. It looks like I edit the wrong page. Actually I want to edit my own page. I'm sorry.

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Klorofil.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Klorofil.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:56, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Purefect

A tag has been placed on Purefect, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of Purefect and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. 84.13.214.118 (talk) 22:56, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Purefect.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Purefect.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. NotifyBot (talk) 13:21, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. No clear consensus to delete, and added sources appear reliable and non-trivial.--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 19:33, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

DesktopTwo

DesktopTwo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View AfD)

Article is about software/webware that fails notability guildlines.

• Delete - It is more an advertisement or spam and is not encyclopedic. I believe it was up for speedy a while ago and it is still an advertisement and so brought here to AfD Pmedema (talk) 23:52, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BJ^Talk 23:11, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

I believe the deletion recommendation for this article should be removed.

Desktoptwo has a Google page rank of 6. Presumably Google's page rank algorithm considers, among other things, the number of mentions a page has on the Web plus the number of times users click on search result pages where the corresponding URL appears. Just by this reason it appears that Desktoptwo's relevance is difficult to challenge.

Also, there are countless examples of Wikipedia articles that refer to Web sites or other software products where Google's page rank is under 6 (see article for blip.tv with page rank zero). There also articles about other Web sites in Desktoptwo's space that have the same page rank as Desktoptwo but that are not being submitted for deletion. (see article entry for G.ho.st which also has a page rank of 6).

Finally, the Web as a platform is the most relevant shift in IT of the last few years. Desktoptwo is one of the most important proponents of such model. It'd be unwise, to say the least, to delete from the Wikipedia an article about a Web product that directly challenges the IT establishment by proposing the usage of the Web as a computing platform. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.151.206.254 (talk) 16:53, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

• Comment Article also fails WP:RS and your "near future" comment fails WP:CRYSTAL. --Pmedema (talk) 11:01, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
• Keep per the reliable sources in the article.--CastAStone/^{/₵₳$↑₳₴₮ʘ№€} 13:27, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

References have been provided in the article to comply with WP:RS. Those references also support the relevance of the article's object. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.151.206.254 (talk) 13:30, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

AfD nomination of DesktopTwo

I have nominated DesktopTwo, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DesktopTwo. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Pmedema (talk) 23:59, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of DesktopTwo

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is DesktopTwo. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DesktopTwo (2nd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:06, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Desktoptwo.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Desktoptwo.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:34, 26 October 2010 (UTC)