Maximus7792

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia:Articles for creation/ConEmu.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 01:49, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Dmitrij, You said, "This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources". How many reliable sources article must contains? There is, for example, Scott Hanselman, jpsoft.com. Are they not reliable? Maximus7792 (talk) 07:52, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Blogs are unreliable. You need at least reputable news media coverage. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 10:22, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Dmitrij, is TechNet Magazine reliable enough? — Maximus7792 (talk) 10:05, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

It is not the best possible source, but in my opinion it is above the line. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 10:48, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

Hello, Maximus7792, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. To get the most out of Wikipedia, you may benefit from following some of the links below. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! --Snowysusan (talk) 02:35, 17 September 2012 (UTC) Getting started Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Finding your way around Table of contents Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles How you can help Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

Spelling and grammar check?

May I request some spelling and grammar check for Wikipedia:Articles for creation/ConEmu using this tag? I'm trying to submit my first article. Is it clear enough and is it match to Wikipedia rules? Maximus7792 (talk) 06:11, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

Hi! I'll happily proof-read the article for you now! ^Alex J _Fox (Talk) (Contribs) 14:13, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

Hello again, The article looks fine to me in terms of grammar, punctuation and spelling. However, remember that this is the English Wikipedia and therefore references in any other language require the reader to understand multiple languages, which is rarely the case. I would suggest that you look for English language references before submitting the article for another review. Other than that, the article looks very nice indeed, well done! ^Alex J _Fox (Talk) (Contribs) 14:27, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

ConEmu, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SarahStierch (talk) 18:50, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:ConEmu icon.png

Thanks for uploading File:ConEmu icon.png, which you've attributed to http://code.google.com/p/conemu-maximus5/. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 02:12, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you. 97.77.251.242 (talk) 18:52, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of ConEmu

The article ConEmu has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable software. Fails WP:PRODUCT. Possible COI issue; see WP:COIN#ConEmu

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. John Nagle (talk) 22:16, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of ConEmu for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ConEmu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ConEmu until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. John Nagle (talk) 19:36, 23 August 2015 (UTC)