Mcatricala

AfC notification: Draft:David Weiss has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:David Weiss. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 21:59, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: David Weiss (author) (October 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Whispering was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:David Weiss (author) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:David Weiss (author), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Whispering 19:38, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

Hello, Mcatricala! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Whispering 19:38, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:David Weiss (author)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:David Weiss (author), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 06:27, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

Help me!

Please help me with...My draft for submission, David Weiss (author) was deleted even after I submitted a reply as to why it should not be deleted. Now my reply to the deletion has been removed, as has the page. I wasn't able to make any edits as I was traveling in Italy without a computer. How can I recover the page in an attempt to re-write so it reads more "encyclopedic"? What phrases need to be added/removed to insure it reads as encyclopedic?

Mcatricala (talk) 15:44, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

You can contact the deleting administrator, RHaworth on their talk page and request that they email you the deleted content. Not all such requests will be honored (for instance, you probably won't get back a copy of a page deemed to have been a copyright violation). I'm not an admin, so I can't see the deleted draft and thus can't advise on what wording changes might make the submission more acceptable. It's really common to see puffery like "award-winning" or "bestseller" removed from drafts and enough of that sort of language can cause a draft to read as primarily promotional. It's really important to have independent, notability references that satisfy one or more of the criteria at NAUTHOR. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 16:38, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: David Solomon Weiss has been accepted

David Solomon Weiss, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 19:39, 27 November 2018 (UTC)

Ways to improve David Solomon Weiss

Hello, Mcatricala,

Thanks for creating David Solomon Weiss! I edit here too, under the username Rosguill and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Consider breaking up the article into more paragraphs and subsections to make it easier to read.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

_signed, Rosguill ^talk 22:33, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

{{Re|Rosguill}} Thank you Rosguill for your suggestions. I'm still learning all the wiki code, so I hope I'm replying in the right place. ;) Feel free to review it again and see if the changes I've made make it easier to read. Mcatricala (talk) 13:26, 2 January 2019 (UTC)mcatricala

Image without license

Thank you MifterBot. How does one use a logo in the public domain? I obviously didn't create the logo, there are other logos on wikipedia elsewhere. How does one use those? I can't find a tag for those. Mcatricala (talk) 20:07, 17 January 2020 (UTC)mcatricala

Unspecified source/license for File:Logo jewish fiction (original, full size).jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Logo jewish fiction (original, full size).jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:File copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 19:45, 17 January 2020 (UTC)