Mchartr99

Welcome!

Hello, Mchartr99, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Librex, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Your first article
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 20:02, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Librex

The article Librex has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable software product.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 20:02, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

You added a lot of references to the article about Librex, but none of them support the notability of the product. The references you've added amount to primary sources (information from the publisher's (Corium) own website or press releases published by Corium) or trivial listings and advertisements. None of them amount to any significant coverage of this product in independant sources. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 20:32, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Maintenance templates

You removed the maintenance templates regarding the need for secondary sources to bolster the notability from Librex, stating:

New references - Multiple of them are from sites with very good notability (2 AIIM references, the main organization in content management, 1 reference from Microsoft, 1 reference as a top tool for Alfresco (nomanualdataentry.org), many partner references)

But the sources do not appear to be independent, regardless of the "notability" of the websites from which they are taken.

1. This source is a press release published by Corium (Librex' publisher) on the AIIM website.
2. This is a blog entry listing the various tools available to scan documents into Alfresco, of which Librex is but one entry.
3. This is essentially an advertisement for Librex at Microsoft's Pinpoint website.
4. This is a listing of business partners of IroSoft, of which Corium is apparently one.
5. This is a listing of business partners of PG Solutions, of which Corium is apparently one.
6. This is a case study published by Corium detailing how AIIM members might use Corium's Librex product; which amounts to little more than a detailed adverstisement.
7. This appears to be an advertisement for Corium placed on the AppNovation website without a clear indication of why AppNovation would host such and ad, but an ad is an ad no matter why it is hosted.
8. The rest of the references in the article are either to Corium's own website, or to Youtube videos (which are never acceptable as reliable sources at Wikipedia.

In short, none of the sources listed on the page amount to significant coverage in reliable, independent sources, as required by Wikipedia's notability policy. For this reason, I will restore the maintenance templates on the page. If you are able to address these issues, great. If not, the article will likely face deletion. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 21:30, 18 February 2015 (UTC)