Me myself or I

August 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Yohoho! Puzzle Pirates, you will be blocked from editing. SpigotMap 20:12, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

• I did NOT intend to vandalize. I was trying to improve that part of the article, not vandalize it. If it seemed like or was vandalism, then I am sorry. Me myself or I 09:44, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

For what it's worth, I agree that your edits were constructive and should not have been reverted, especially with so strong a warning. --ElizabethFong 09:52, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

There was very little on that section, and what I had removed I had essentially written again (although in different wording), so that hadn't damaged the page. I think that it wasn't vandalism myself, but since I'm the 'vandal' I'm not going to get believed... Me myself or I 10:01, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

I did edit it again, with what I put last time, but this time I didn't remove anything. I just hope that that isn't seen as vandalism... Me myself or I 10:04, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Hopefully this dispute is now over. It seems that what I put has not been taken to be vandalism. Either way, it is over now. Me myself or I 11:40, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

Graveyard chess

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article Graveyard chess, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 22:59, 29 February 2008 (UTC)