"Sagar Sethi" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Sagar Sethi. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 1#Sagar Sethi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 17:06, 1 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

February 2021

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  MER-C 13:57, 20 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • MER-C, why did you block me? Have you read the article? I improved it and it doesn't read advertising. I am not the chef, so it is no way self promotion. I do have a conflict of interest here but if I have violated a conflict of interest or notability policy then you could have warned me instead of blocking me? Mearitas (talk) 16:01, 20 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
    You are the latest in a series of accounts to spam this subject. Sockpuppetry is a block on sight offence, and so is WP:UPE. MER-C 16:21, 20 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
    MER-C,Thank you for the information but I was not aware if other editors before me tried to spam it and I should not be held responsible for others mistakes. What I posted was not spam and the content was supported by reliable references. I have read WP:UPE but I did not find "block on sight" anywhere but I did find: "...and whose postings are in apparent violation of this guideline, should be made aware of this guideline and warned not to continue their problematic editing. If the same pattern of editing continues after the warning, the account may be blocked.". Can you please care to explain? Mearitas (talk) 18:28, 20 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
    Wikipedia:Blocking_policy#Preliminary:_education_and_warnings - "On the other hand, users acting in bad faith, whose main or only use is forbidden activity... do not require any warning and may be blocked immediately." UPE is always in bad faith due to the dishonesty involved. I will not comment on this further. MER-C 18:44, 20 February 2021 (UTC)Reply