Your draft article, Draft:Kimberly Hardin

edit
 

Hello, Media updates2021. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kimberly Hardin".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 23:34, 18 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kimberly Hardin (February 7)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 19:00, 7 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
Why is this page being declined?
This page is not about myself. I just want to create this page for this person. I think she is notable and deserves a page. She's doing great things. Media updates2021 (talk) 18:14, 3 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
In order for an article’s subject to be considered notable by the Wikipedia community, we require that it receive significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject this is what you base an article on. Your draft Draft:Kimberly Hardin has no such sources so zero evidence of notability. Theroadislong (talk) 18:29, 3 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Media updates2021! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 19:00, 7 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
edit
 

Hello Media updates2021. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Media updates2021. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Media updates2021|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Theroadislong (talk) 18:30, 3 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello
I am not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits.
When can we set up the call on phone? Media updates2021 (talk) 15:39, 9 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
Hello
I am not being directly or indirectly compensated for my edits. Media updates2021 (talk) 14:25, 11 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
I am not being directly or indirectly compensated for my edits. Media updates2021 (talk) 19:52, 21 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
Ok, but articles require sourcing. A Wikipedia article summarizes what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about a topic showing how they meet the special Wikipedia definition of a notable person. Theroadislong (talk) 20:04, 21 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
Do you have a template for the perfect article with sourcing examples? I have all the sourcing and references now. Media updates2021 (talk) 20:29, 22 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

edit
 
Hello, Media updates2021. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by ARoseWolf 20:14, 21 June 2022 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Kimberly Hardin June 2022

edit

  Hello, Media updates2021. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kimberly Hardin June 2022, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:03, 17 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Kimberly Hardin June 2022

edit
 

Hello, Media updates2021. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kimberly Hardin June 2022".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 19:13, 17 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Kimberly Hardin

edit
 

Hello, Media updates2021. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kimberly Hardin".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:52, 21 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

April 2023

edit

  Hello, I'm 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.


  One of your recent edits has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 00:52, 14 April 2023 (UTC)Reply