Mehrnazzhian

Mehrnazzhian, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Mehrnazzhian! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! Rosiestep (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:19, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Some baklava for you!

hi Mehrnazzh (talk) 23:12, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

Problems with editing Safe semantics

1. Recent editing of yours copied content which has been published in "A protocol for implementing byzantine storage in churn-prone distributed systems" by Roberto Baldoni, Silvia Bonomi, & AmirSoltaniNezhad. This was a breach of copyright, so the editing has been reverted.
2. Can you explain why you keep replacing "Safe Semantics" with "Safe Semantic(safe register)"? As far as I have ever seen, the form "semantic" is only ever used adjectivally, and the noun is normally "semantics". Also, I don't see any good reason for appending "(safe register)": is the term frequently used as an synonym of "safe semantics"? I don't see that it is.
3. No matter what the merits or demerits of your editing, repeatedly making the same edit when others have reverted it, known as edit warring, is considered disruptive, and can lead to being blocked from editing. If you are convinced you are right, explain your reasons, and be prepared to discuss the issues, with a view to trying to reach agreement, but don't keep repeating the same edit over and over again. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 22:18, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

December 2014

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Safe semantics has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Safe semantics was changed by Mehrnazzhian (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.856943 on 2014-12-11T01:03:54+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:03, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)