Mehwei
| This is Mehwei's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Advanced Nursing Process (August 7)
edit
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Advanced Nursing Process and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Advanced Nursing Process, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello, Mehwei!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DGG ( talk ) 19:11, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
|
Hello, Mehwei. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Advanced Nursing Process.
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 06:49, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
Hello
Hi I have newly written the text on the Advanced Nursing Process. This is not the same as Advanced Nursing (which describes Master prepared nurses holding an advanced nursing degree). The Advanced Nursing Process is a new concept that is not yet described in Wikipedia; and Im a specialist in this topic, and have added lots of research sources.
I would be glad for help in writing this new contribution so it suits Wikipedia, and mainly with the formatting of this article.
Kind regards Mehwei
The Advanced Nursing Process
editThe Advanced Nursing Process is the new version of the generally known Nursing Process, which provides a structure for nursing practice and is well established worldwide [1-4]. The Nursing Process leads the nurse to assess patients’ care needs and to plan and evaluate nursing care. It contains five phases: Nursing Assessment, Nursing Diagnoses, Outcomes / Planning, Implementation, and Evaluation [2, 5]. However, this structure was described as being empty of knowledge, as it was not described by literature-based, standardized concepts [6, 7]. Therefore, the question was: What does the Nursing Process consist of? What content knowledge should it contain to be taught and researched?
To fill this gap, the Advanced Nursing Process was defined and developed. The term Advanced Nursing Process was first mentioned by Ackley & Ladwig [1], whereas “advanced” means “further developed, deepened, based on scientifically defined concepts”. Later, Müller-Staub et al., (2015) developed this concept and published a literature-based definition: “The Advanced Nursing Process consists of defined, validated concepts. It includes assessment, nursing diagnoses, nursing interventions, and nursing outcomes that are rooted in scientifically based nursing classifications” [8], page 13. This expert-consented paper was also published in French and German [9, 10].
Today, the Advanced Nursing Process is taught and implemented by using standardized nursing classifications [6-28]. To teach nurses’ in the Advanced Nursing Process, the method ‘Guided Clinical Reasoning’ – a validated case study teaching method – has proven to be supportive [12, 29-35].
Research indicates [21, 36, 37] that three nursing classifications best represent the body of knowledge in nursing: the Nursing Diagnosis Classification NANDA-I [38], the Nursing Interventions Classification NIC [39, 40], and the Nursing Outcomes Classification NOC [18]. Together, they are called NNN-Classification [41]. The NNN are the best researched and validated, as well as the most internationally used nursing classifications [17, 26, 36, 37, 42]. The NNN provide the content for the Advanced Nursing Process and contain 244 defined nursing diagnoses [38], 540 NOC nursing outcomes [18], and 565 NIC nursing interventions [40].
The aim of the Advanced Nursing Process is the application of scientific knowledge to clinical patient situations by defined and validated concepts of nursing diagnoses, interventions and nursing-sensitive patient outcomes [43-54]. This aim is reached by applying the NNN in the Advanced Nursing Process in practice and by implementing it into Electronic Health Records (EHRs) [8, 12, 16, 19, 21, 24, 33, 36, 55-60].
An internationally consented standard gives direction on how to develop a Nursing Process - Clinical Decision Support System (NP-CDSS) in EHRs to help nurses in applying NNN in the Advanced Nursing Process. With the aid of an NP-CDSS, clinical nurses are fully supported to apply evidenced knowledge in care planning and evaluations [61]. Studies have shown that using the Advanced Nursing Process significantly enhances patient outcomes [12, 30, 31, 33, 42, 57, 62-64]. The NNN classifications of nursing diagnoses, interventions and outcomes contribute to the establishment of nursing as an independent profession with its own professional body of knowledge. Applying the NNN classifications in the Advanced Nursing Process points out what nurses do, why they do it, which objectives nurses’ pursue and which nursing-sensitive patient outcomes patients achieve. Additionally, the NNN makes clear what the difference is between nursing and other health professions [3, 4, 8, 17].
Mehwei (talk) 14:50, 3 August 2020 (UTC) --Mehwei (talk) 14:50, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
References
edit1. Ackley, B.J. and G.B. Ladwig, Nursing diagnosis handbook: An evidence-based guide to planning care. 10 ed. 2011, St. Louis: Mosby/Elsevier.
2. American Nurses Association. What is nursing? The nursing process. 2009 January 5 [cited 2015 January 5]; Available from: http://www.nursingworld.org/EspeciallyForYou/What-is-Nursing/Tools-You-Need/Thenursingprocess.html.
3. American Nurses Association. What is nursing? 2013 [cited 2013 Oct.10]; Available from: http://www.nursingworld.org/EspeciallyForYou/What-is-Nursing.
4. Bickford, C.J., L. Marion, and S. Gazaway, eds. Nursing: Scope and Standards of Practice. 3 ed. 2015, American Nurses Association: Silver Spring, Maryland.
5. American Nurses Association, Nursing's social policy statement: The essence of the profession. 5 ed. 2010, Sliver Spring, Maryland: American Nurses Association. 144.
6. Bakken, S., et al., Utility of a standardized nursing terminology to evaluate dosage and tailoring of an HIV/AIDS adherence intervention. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 2005. 37(3): p. 251-257.
7. Beyea, S.C., Standardized language--making nursing practice count. AORN Journal, 1999. 70(5): p. 831-834. 837-838.
8. Müller-Staub, M., et al., Expert report on nurses' responsibility. 2015, Bern: Swiss Nursing Science Association (ANS).
9. Müller Staub, M., et al., Rapport d’expertes concernant le domaine de responsabilité des soins infirmiers. 2015, Bern: Association Suisse Pour les Sciences Infirmières (AAPSI). 40.
10. Müller-Staub, M., et al., Expertenbericht zum Verantwortungsbereich der Pflege. 2015, Bern: Schweizerischer Verein für Pflegewissenschaft VFP. 41.
11. Ackley, B.J., G.B. Ladwig, and M.B. Flynn Makic, Nursing diagnosis handbook: An evidence-based guide to planning care. 2017, St. Louis: Mosby/Elsevier.
12. Bruylands, M., et al., Effects on the quality of the nursing care process through an educational program and the use of electronic nursing documentation. International journal of nursing knowledge, 2013. 24(3): p. 163-70.
13. Doenges, M., M.F. Moorhouse, and A. Geissler-Murr, Nursing diagnosis manual: Planning, individualizing, and documenting client care. 2005, Philadelphia: F.A. Davis.
14. Doenges, M., et al., Pflegediagnosen und Massnahmen. 6 ed. 2018, Bern: Hogrefe.
15. Doenges, M.E., M.F. Moorhouse, and A.C. Murr, Nurse's pocket guide: Diagnoses, prioritized interventions, and rationales. 13 ed. 2016, Philadelphia: F. A. Davis.
16. Keenan, G.M., et al., A Shovel-Ready Solution to Fill the Nursing Data Gap in the Interdisciplinary Clinical Picture. Int J Nurs Knowl, 2018. 29(1): p. 49-58.
17. Kuiper, R.A., et al., Clinical reasoning and standardized terminology, in The essentials of clinical reasoning for nurses: Using the Outcome-Present State-Test Model for reflective practice, S.T.T. International, Editor. 2017, Sigma Theta Tau International. p. 23-46.
18. Moorhead, S., et al., Nursing outcomes classification (NOC). 6 ed. 2018, St. Louis: Elsevier.
19. Müller Staub, M., et al., Anforderungen an die Pflegeprozess-Dokumentation. 2018, Zürich: Waispital.
20. Müller Staub, M., H. de Graaf-Waar, and W. Paans, Standard for Nursing Process Clinical Decision Support Systems (NP-CDSS) in EHRs, in ACENDIO. 2015, Association for Common European Nursing Diagnoses, Intervention and Outcomes: Bern.
21. Müller Staub, M., P. König, and K. Schalek, eds. Pflegeklassifikationen: Anwendung in Praxis, Bildung und elektronischer Pflegedokumentation. Vol. 1. 2017, Hogrefe: Bern. 416.
22. Müller-Staub, M., ed. Pflegeprozess und kritisches Denken. ed. R. Alfaro-LeFevre. 2013, Huber: Bern. 509.
23. Müller-Staub, M., Denkend denken was man denkt. Padua, 2015. 10(5): p. 285-291. 24. Müller-Staub, M. and M. Odenbreit, Assessment-Instrumente die den Pflegeprozess berücksichtigen, in Pflegeklassifikationen: Anwendung in Praxis, Bildung und elektronischer Pflegedokumentation, M. Müller-Staub, K. Schalek, and P. König, Editors. 2017, Hogrefe: Bern.
25. Muller-Staub, M. and W. Paans, A Standard for Nursing Process - Clinical Decision Support Systems (NP-CDSS). Stud Health Technol Inform, 2016. 225: p. 810-1.
26. Müller-Staub, M. and E. Rappold, Klassifikationen/Systeme – Beurteilung anhand von Studien, in Pflegeklassifikationen: Anwendung in Praxis, Bildung und elektronischer Pflegedokumentation, M. Müller-Staub, K. Schalek, and P. König, Editors. 2017, Hogrefe: Bern.
27. Saranto, K., et al., Impacts of structuring nursing records: a systematic review. Scand J Caring Sci, 2014. 28(4): p. 629-47.
28. Wilkinson, J.M., Nursing process and critical thinking. 2012, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
29. Leoni-Scheiber, C., R.M. Gothe, and M. Muller-Staub, [Nurses' Attitudes toward the "Advanced Nursing Process" before and after an educational intervention - a quasi-experimental study]. Pflege, 2016. 29(1): p. 33-42.
30. Leoni-Scheiber, C., H. Mayer, and M. Muller-Staub, Measuring the effects of guided clinical reasoning on the Advanced Nursing Process quality, on nurses' knowledge and attitude: Study protocol. Nurs Open, 2019. 6(3): p. 1269-1280.
31. Leoni-Scheiber, C., H. Mayer, and M. Muller-Staub, Ubereinstimmung des Advanced Nursing Process mit Beobachtungen, Interviews und Pflegedokumentationen im Akutspital. Pflege, 2019: p. 1-10.
32. Müller-Staub, M., Klinische Entscheidungsfindung und kritisches Denken im pflegediagnostischen Prozess. Pflege: Die wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift für Pflegeberufe, 2006. 19(5): p. 275-279.
33. Müller-Staub, M., et al., Improved quality of nursing documentation: Results of a nursing diagnoses, interventions and outcomes implementation study. International Journal of Nursing Terminologies and Classifications, 2007. 18(1): p. 5-17.
34. Müller-Staub, M., et al., Implementing nursing diagnostics effectively: cluster randomized trial. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 2008. 63(3): p. 291-301.
35. Müller-Staub, M. and U. Stuker-Studer, Klinische Entscheidungsfindung: Förderung des kritischen Denkens im pflegediagnostischen Prozess durch Fallbesprechungen. Pflege: Die wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift für Pflegeberufe, 2006. 19(5): p. 281-286.
36. Odenbreit, M., et al., Nursing classifications: Criteria and evaluation, in NANDA International Nursing Diagnoses: Definitions and classification 2012-2014, T.H. Herdman, Editor. 2012, Wiley-Blackwell: Oxford. p. 133-143.
37. Tastan, S., et al., Evidence for the existing American Nurses Association-recognized standardized nursing terminologies: a systematic review. Int J Nurs Stud, 2014. 51(8): p. 1160-70.
38. Herdman, T.H. and S. Kamitsuru, eds. NANDA International nursing diagnoses: Definitions and classification 2018-2020. 2018, Thieme: New York.
39. Bulechek, G., et al., Nursing interventions classification. 6 ed. 2013, St. Louis: Elsevier.
40. Butcher, H., et al., Nursing Interventions Classification (NIC). 2018, Elsevier: St. Louis.
41. Johnson, M., et al., NOC and NIC linkages to NANDA-I and clinical conditions. 3 ed. 2012, Maryland Heights: Elsevier Mosby. 422.
42. Rabelo-Silva, E.R., et al., Advanced Nursing Process quality: Comparing the International Classification for Nursing Practice (ICNP) with the NANDA-International (NANDA-I) and Nursing Interventions Classification (NIC). J Clin Nurs, 2017. 26(3-4): p. 379-387.
43. Jones, D., et al., Standardized nursing languages: essential for the nursing workforce. Annual review of nursing research, 2010. 28: p. 253-94.
44. Lopez, K.D., et al., Toward a More Robust and Efficient Usability Testing Method of Clinical Decision Support for Nurses Derived From Nursing Electronic Health Record Data. Int J Nurs Knowl, 2017. 28(4): p. 211-218.
45. Lunney, M. and M. Müller-Staub, Nursing diagnosis and research, in NANDA International Nursing Diagnoses: Definitions and classification 2012-2014, T.H. Herdman, Editor. 2012, Wiley-Blackwell: Oxford. p. 114-121.
46. Müller-Staub, M., et al., Testing the Q-DIO as an instrument to measure the documented quality of nursing diagnoses, interventions, and outcomes. International journal of nursing terminologies and classifications : the official journal of NANDA International, 2008. 19(1): p. 20-7.
47. Odutayo, P.O., et al., Impact of an educational program on the use of standardized nursing languages for nursing documentation among public health nurses in Nigeria. Int J Nurs Knowl, 2013. 24(2): p. 108-112.
48. Paans, W., M. Muller-Staub, and W.P. Krijnen, Outcome Calculations Based on Nursing Documentation in the First Generation of Electronic Health Records in the Netherlands. Stud Health Technol Inform, 2016. 225: p. 457-60.
49. Paans, W., et al., Do knowledge, knowledge sources and reasoning skills affect the accuracy of nursing diagnoses? a randomised study. BMC Nurs, 2012. 11: p. 11.
50. Polit, D.F. and C. Tatano Beck, Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice. 9 ed. 2012, Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer /Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins.
51. Sanson, G., et al., Impact of nursing diagnoses on patient and organisational outcomes: a systematic literature review. J Clin Nurs, 2017. 26: p. 3764–3783.
52. Silva-Rabelo, E.R., et al. Quality of nursing records comparing the standardized languages NANDA-I/NIC and ICNP in 10th European Conference of ACENDIO - eHEALTH AND NURSING: Knowledge for Patient Care. 2015. Bern: ACENDIO Abstracts Conference CD.
53. Tuinman, A., et al., Accuracy of documentation in the nursing care plan in long-term institutional care. Geriatr Nurs, 2017. 38(6): p. 578-583.
54. Welton, J.M. and E.M. Harper, Nursing Care Value-Based Financial Models. Nurs Econ, 2015. 33(1): p. 14-9, 25.
55. Keenan, G., et al., Challenges to nurses' efforts of retrieving, documenting, and communicating patient care information. J Am Med Inform Assoc, 2013. 20(2): p. 245-51.
56. Müller Staub, M., Anforderungskriterien Pflegeassessment und Pflegeprozess- Dokumentation. 2017, Wil: Pflege PBS.
57. Müller-Staub, M., Evaluation of the implementation of nursing diagnostics: A study on the use of nursing diagnoses, interventions and outcomes in nursing documentation. 2007, Wageningen: Ponsen & Looijen. 175.
58. Odenbreit, M., Pflegedaten sinnvoll nutzen: Elektronische Pflegedokumentation und DRG, in Pflegeklassifikationen: Anwendung in Praxis, Bildung und elektronischer Pflegedokumentation, M. Müller-Staub, K. Schalek, and P. König, Editors. 2017, Hogrefe: Bern. p. Kap. 19.
59. Odenbreit, M., C. Leoni-Scheiber, and E. Bättig, Wissenschaftliche Stellungnahme: NANDA-I − POP, Schweizerischer Verein für Pflegewissenschaft VFP, Editor. 2016, Schweizerischer Verein für Pflegewissenschaft (VFP): Bern. p. 1-5.
60. Paans, W., M. Müller-Staub, and W.P. Krijnen, Outcome calculations based on nursing documentation in the first generation of electronic health records in the Netherlands, in NI16. 2016, IOS Press: Amsterdam.
61. Muller-Staub, M., H. de Graaf-Waar, and W. Paans, An Internationally Consented Standard for Nursing Process-Clinical Decision Support Systems in Electronic Health Records. Comput Inform Nurs, 2016. 34(11): p. 493-502.
62. Leoni-Scheiber, C., H. Mayer, and M. Muller-Staub, Relationships between the Advanced Nursing Process quality and nurses' and patient' characteristics: A cross-sectional study. Nurs Open, 2020. 7(1): p. 419-429.
63. Odenbreit, M., et al. Wissenschaftliche Empfehlung des VFP für standardisierte Pflegefachsprachen in Klinikinformations-Systemen (KIS). 2018. 5.
64. Zanon, D.C., D. Gralher, and M. Muller-Staub, Interventions of the nursing diagnosis "Acute Pain" - Evaluation of patients' experiences after total hip arthroplasty compared with the nursing record by using Q-DIO-Pain: a mixed methods study. Pflege, 2017. 30(3): p. 129-138.
--14:50, 3 August 2020 (UTC)Mehwei (talk)
<gallery> Example.jpg|Caption1
Your submission at Articles for creation: Advanced Nursing Process (October 21)
edit - If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Advanced Nursing Process and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Advanced Nursing Process, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Your submission at Articles for creation
edit - If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
I'm grateful for help to revise the text on the Advanced Nursing Process for fitting to Wikipedia. Im experienced in scientific writing, but not in encyclopaedia style. If you can assist in rewriting, I appreciate the draft, thanks.
Mehwei (talk) 17:04, 5 November 2020 (UTC) Mehwei (talk) 17:04, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Advanced Nursing Process (April 11)
edit - If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Advanced Nursing Process and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Advanced Nursing Process, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Concern regarding Draft:Advanced Nursing Process
edit
Hello, Mehwei. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Advanced Nursing Process, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:02, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Advanced Nursing Process
edit Hello, Mehwei. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Advanced Nursing Process".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 15:07, 17 November 2021 (UTC)