This user has been on Wikipedia for 12 years and 23 days.

Mejbp, you are invited to the Teahouse

edit
 

Hi Mejbp! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Please join other people who edit Wikipedia at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Wikipedia where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Writ Keeper (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:21, 7 November 2012 (UTC)Reply
Thanks Writ Keeper. I submitted an article and it was declined. I modeled it after several that are in live space, and have numerous citations. My article was called a "public relations article" by the reviewer and not important. Of course I disagree. Any suggestions on improvement is appreciated. I also submitted a help request at the TeaHouse. Article is here- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Video_Quality_in_Public_Safety_Working_Group
Thanks,
Mejbp (talk) 04:35, 12 November 2012 (UTC)Reply


Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

edit
 
Hello, Mejbp. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Gtwfan52 (talk) 04:31, 12 November 2012 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).Reply

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

edit
 
Hello, Mejbp. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Go Phightins! 00:39, 27 November 2012 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation

edit
 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. The submission has not been accepted because it included copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Your submission at Articles for creation

edit
 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Your submission at Articles for creation

edit
 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Your submission at Articles for creation

edit
 
Glossary of Video Terms, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Danger High voltage! 02:15, 20 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Video Quality in Public Safety Working Group, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 17:50, 20 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Video Quality in Public Safety Working Group

edit
 

Hello Mejbp. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Video Quality in Public Safety Working Group".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Video Quality in Public Safety Working Group}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 20:01, 26 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Underscores and piping and such

edit

You can link Glossary of video terms this way, with spaces instead of underscores; no need for piping. Please go back and fix all the articles where you inserted the overly-complicated piped link instead of normal wiki style link. Dicklyon (talk) 06:04, 2 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Done...--Mejbp (talk) 17:46, 2 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your request for undeletion

edit

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that a response has been made at Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion regarding a submission you made. The thread is Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Video Quality in Public Safety Working Group. JohnCD (talk) 23:11, 2 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply