MelissaRauch1
October 2013
edit
Hello, I'm SummerPhD. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Melissa Rauch without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! SummerPhD (talk) 13:11, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm EuroCarGT. I noticed that you recently removed all content from Talk:Melissa Rauch, with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, I restored the page's content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ///EuroCarGT 19:33, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Wrecking Ball (Miley Cyrus song) with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. DoorsAjar (talk) 19:36, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Melissa Rauch, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Melissa Rauch was changed by MelissaRauch1 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.885213 on 2013-10-13T19:36:54+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:36, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
Hello, MelissaRauch1. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Melissa Rauch, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.
All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.
If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:
- Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
- Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
- Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
- Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.
Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. ///EuroCarGT 19:41, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
Let me explain something about Wikipedia to you: We are not a social network; we are an encyclopedia. Also, we don't allow article subjects to unilaterally control the content of their articles. If you have some issues with facts in an article, you may contact our Volunteer Response Team at info-en-q@wikimedia.org or raise concerns on the article's talk page. But if you keep going in this manner, you will more likely than not end up blocked. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 19:42, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Fort Worth, Texas. ///EuroCarGT 19:43, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved. Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 19:47, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
MelissaRauch1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am not actually making the legal threats, it was just me acting silly.
Decline reason:
I can't find any constructive edits in your history; I've deleted a few that were vandalism or WP:BLP violations. Please go be silly elsewhere. Kuru (talk) 19:59, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- "Revert this nonsense; I COULD SUE YOU IF THIS CONTINUES, THIS IS MY ARTICLE" is not you acting silly; it's you threatening legal action if we don't give you what you want. We don't appreciate such; it has a chilling effect on others trying to improve the article and is thus antithetical to how Wikipedia operates. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 19:51, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
- OK, I won't make legal threats. I rescind them immediately. --MelissaRauch1 (talk) 19:58, 13 October 2013 (UTC)