Mello yello 424

Speedy deletion of ASTRONAUTICALISATION

A tag has been placed on ASTRONAUTICALISATION requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Fribbler (talk) 13:34, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

June 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from ASTRONAUTICALISATION, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Sorry; I probably shouldn't have done a flat edit restoration. I80and (talk) 13:52, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with ASTRONAUTICALISATION. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you. Avnjay^Talk 13:53, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with ASTRONAUTICALISATION. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. As you can see it will just be reverted every time you do, so why bother? Avnjay^Talk 14:05, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of ASTRONAUTICALISATION

A tag has been placed on ASTRONAUTICALISATION, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Avnjay^Talk 14:24, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, such as ASTRONAUTICALISATION, you will be blocked from editing. The article was deleted for a reason. Please dont recreate it. Ironholds 14:40, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

I deleted the article because there is no such word, and it was being used to make disparaging remarks. ... discospinster _talk 15:05, 13 June 2008 (UTC)