Welcome!

edit

Hello, Mercede Erfanian, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited was Misophonia, which appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Lklundin (talk) 22:10, 1 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to Wikipedia from the Wikiproject Medicine!

edit
Welcome to Wikipedia and Wikiproject Medicine

Welcome to Wikipedia from Wikiproject Medicine (also known as WPMED).

We're a group of editors who strive to improve the quality of content about health here on Wikipedia, pursuing the mission of Wikipedia to provide the public with articles that present accepted knowledge, created and maintained by a community of editors.

One of our members has noticed that you are interested in editing medical articles; it's great to have a new interested editor on board!

First, some basics about editing Wikipedia, which is a strange place behind the scenes; you may find some of the ways we operate to be surprising. Please take your time and understand how this place works. Here are some useful links, which have information to help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

  • Everything starts with the mission - the mission of Wikipedia is to provide the public with articles that summarize accepted knowledge, working in a community of editors. (see WP:NOT)
  • We find "accepted knowledge" for biomedical information in sources defined by WP:MEDRS -- we generally use literature reviews published in good journals or statements by major medical or scientific bodies and we generally avoid using research papers, editorials, and popular media as sources for such content. We read MEDRS sources and summarize them, giving the most space and emphasis (what we call WP:WEIGHT) to the most prevalent views found in MEDRS sources.
  • Please see WPMED's "how to" guide for editing content about health
  • More generally please see The five pillars of Wikipedia and please be aware of the "policies and guidelines" that govern what we do here; these have been generated by the community itself over the last fifteen years, and you will need to learn them (which is not too hard, it just takes some time). Documents about Wikipedia - the "back office" - reside in "Wikipedia space" where document titles are preceded by "Wikipedia:" (often abbreviated "WP:"). WP space is separate from "article space" (also called "mainspace") - the document at WP:CONSENSUS is different from, and serves as a different purpose than, the document at Consensus.

Every article and page in Wikipedia has an associated talk page, and these pages are essential because we editors use them to collaborate and work out disagreements. (This is your Talk page, associated with your user page.) When you use a Talk page, you should sign your name by typing four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comment; the Wikipedia software will automatically convert that into links to your Userpage and this page and will add a datestamp. This is how we know who said what. We also "thread" comments in a way that you will learn with time. Please see the Talk Page Guidelines to learn how to use talk pages.

  • Thanks for coming aboard! We always appreciate a new editor. Feel free to leave us a message at any time on our talk page. If you are interested in joining the project yourself, there is a participant list where you can sign up. You can also just add our talk page to your watchlist and join in discussions that interest you. Please leave a message on the WPMED talk page if you have any problems, suggestions, would like review of an article, need suggestions for articles to edit, or would like some collaboration when editing!
  • The Wikipedia community includes a wide variety of editors with different interests, skills, and knowledge. We all manage to get along through a lot of discussion that happens under the scenes and through the bold, edit, discuss editing cycle. If you encounter any problems, you can discuss it on an article's talk page or post a message on the WPMED talk page.

Feel free to drop a note below if you have any questions or problems. I wish you all the best here in Wikipedia! Jytdog (talk) 17:50, 24 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

WP:SELFCITE, WP:REFSPAM

edit

Your contributions to date seem to be all about adding references to papers by Mercede Erfanian.

While we love experts here (see WP:EXPERT) we do not love experts who use their editing privileges to promote their own work, which is a violation of the policy against abusing WP for promotion. This is also considered a form of spam -- see WP:REFSPAM. Please also see WP:SELFCITE and WP:MEDCOI.

We do love experts, and it would wonderful if you would consider contributing more broadly. But please, enough of the refspamming. Thanks. Jytdog (talk) 17:54, 24 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Edit warring

edit
 

Your recent editing history at Misophonia shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Jytdog (talk) 22:44, 9 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

copy response here, that was left on my talk page in this diff Jytdog (talk) 14:29, 11 May 2018 (UTC) Reply

Hi,
The other day I received a threatening message from you which I did not like at all. I accused me of " edit war" that was based on a false assumption.
First by this message I want you to stop sending me threatening and childish messages when you have no idea what is happening and try to find out first.
Second, I neither change nor tried to change others materials on Wikipedia but tried to add some evidence-based materials to an incomplete page on misophonia which did not work due to technical problems.
Third, if you are responsible for a public platform like Wikipedia, you need to be way more patient with people not everyone is Einstein like you!!!
Greetings — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mercede Erfanian (talkcontribs) 06:50, 11 May 2018 (UTC)Reply
Hi User:Mercede Erfanian - if by "received messages" you mean the notes on this page, messages like this, are what this page is for. If by "receive messages" you mean emails from Wikipedia, that would be, because your preferences are set to receive emails when certain things happen. You can change your preferences by clicking on "preferences" near the top right corner of every page in Wikipedia when you are logged in.
About "edit warring", you did start to edit war - you boldly added some content here, and after I removed it, you added it back.
The Misophonia page has a long and unfortunate history of the few people who are active in the field, coming to WP to cite their own work. (I am taking your username at face value; if that is incorrect please say so). You can see what I mean about people coming here to cite their own work, in the list at the bottom of the beige box at the "talk page" of the article -- Talk:Misophonia.
That said, I am glad you have started to discuss.
Wikipedia has a whole slew of what we call "policies and guidelines". They are explained some in the "welcome" message above. If you want an all-in-one description, please read User:Jytdog/How. It is important to go slow and take time to learn.
Happy to discuss - please reply here, to keep the discussion in one place. Jytdog (talk) 14:38, 11 May 2018 (UTC)Reply