User talk:MerlinVtwelve/Archive 2
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
Kalki Bhagavan
Vijaykumar a.k.a "Kalki Bhagavan" has never claimed himself as the title of "Kalki Bhagavan" himself; it was a name that stuck from Indian villagers around his headquartes; though he would migh take some advantage of this - as all gurus do - the Kalki_Bhagavan article has to be oriented that way. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.97.51.170 (talk) 00:12, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
- Hi Matthew. Deletion is not the way forward on this, (a) only a afd for the wrong reasons will find non-notable, and (b) rigorous BLP sourcing is best for all concerned - not least those who might fund this gentleman. However input from WP:BLP about the legal content of some newspaper articles cited might be advisable, I don't know myself. In ictu oculi (talk) 05:37, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks, I don't doubt it. As you'll see I restored the newspaper articles. In ictu oculi (talk) 07:31, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
- Mathew, was here (on this space between 05:37, 24 March 2013 - 07:31, 24 March 2013 (UTC)) any piece of your conversation between (talk) ? Because his next edition seems to be a reply. I am curious to know the missing part here. Below is the continuation.
- There is no part of the conversation missing as far as I can see. You can check the edit history of both pages. Also, please sign your posts. M Stone (talk) 21:21, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
Sincere Apologies
Please see oops
Anyhow, the material is being composed offline for a different venue now.
Sorry about any inconveniences caused.
Mike
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.249.36.41 (talk) 21:47, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
sorry forgot to sign again
99.249.36.41 (talk) 21:52, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
- Sure, no worries, looks like I got caught in the crossfire... M Stone (talk) 23:15, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
clear things up
Hi Matthew, read your comment on my talk page.
It seems we started our WP relationship on a wrong foot, with both of us not having good faith on the other. Looking to clear things up and move forward. Now, response to your queries:
- I am doing WP work on my personal interest and time. Had clarified earlier this to you here [[1]]
- My opinion about Kalki Bhagavan is that he is a good human being and is helping people.
- I do respect other view points. It is natural for each of us to have different ideas and views.
- The conversation between In ictu oculi and myself, was about a conversation that I had deleted. The conversation was about a simple request I made to him to review the "biography" section that I had created. I then deleted the conversation, just due to my inexperience with WP protocols. As you may see, In ictu oculi is cool about it. We then had a separate discussion about some translation work he wanted help on.
- The comments by user User: 177.158.129.70 , refer to my edits on the page Kalki Bhagavan. And I have no idea why this person used the word (again), as I do not remember him from earlier..
Let me know if you have any other query. Have a nice day Matthew. Prodigyhk (talk) 11:49, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
- User Prodigyhk asked me at [[2]] if I am the same person that used other IP´s there. In order to keep a good WP:GF tone, I am signing that response here as well. 177.159.22.51 (talk) 00:07, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
- 177.159.22.51 okay, that's fine, it was not really an issue for me. M Stone (talk) 05:04, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
- It seems you are going in circles. Let me repeat myself and make it clear to you
- My relationship with the subject Kalki Bhagavan. As clearly stated in my above response is a person whom I respect as a good person who is helping people.
- Have stated above "doing WP work on my personal interest and time". This means it is not my job nor has anyone instructed me to do this.
- About the deleted conversation with In ictu oculi, since I am unable to satisfy you with my response, request you approach In Ictu directly and check if it was any major issue (or) a minor issue
- About my lack of faith in you. From reading your comments on the talk page and edit history for the last 3 years, it is clear you hate the subject Kalki Bhagavan. Do you have any explanation for your hatred towards this person ?
Talkback
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Oneness University
What new information is there? If you want I can restore the page history. GiantSnowman 09:45, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
- History of Oneness University restored. As it is currently a redirect, I suggest you create a new version of the article in your sandbox and we can review. GiantSnowman 10:14, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
- Hmm, taking a quick look, I cannot see any real independent notability, seperate from Kalki Bhagavan. GiantSnowman 09:24, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
- You need to make that clearer then; you also need to properly cite your references. GiantSnowman 09:58, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
- Hmm, taking a quick look, I cannot see any real independent notability, seperate from Kalki Bhagavan. GiantSnowman 09:24, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
June 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Kalki Bhagavan may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:42, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Done
Done
Don't know what this is about. Please sign your posts. M Stone (talk) 08:32, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |