Merlingoes

Your submission at Articles for creation: 1YC3 (January 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hammersoft was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:\/1YC3 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:\/1YC3, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hammersoft (talk) 01:30, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

Hello, Merlingoes! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hammersoft (talk) 01:30, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:\/1YC3 has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:\/1YC3. Thanks! Hammersoft (talk) 01:32, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 1YC3 (January 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hammersoft was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:\/1YC3 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:\/1YC3, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hammersoft (talk) 01:38, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

Draft:\/1YC3

I strongly recommend you stop submitting this draft for consideration. By your own words, very few people know this film exists (if in fact, it does). It clearly would never pass our guidelines at Wikipedia:Notability (films). Trying to submit this in the face of a blatant failure of this guideline without doing anything to improve this article will, after repeated attempts, lead to a block of your account. Please stop. If you have questions, ask. Continuing as you have is not the way forward. Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 01:39, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

Youtube, especially a link to this material, isn't a reliable source, much less a secondary source in this case. Please STOP submitting this draft for acceptance. It has zero chance of ever being accepted unless you find reliable, secondary sources. Your continued insistence on ignoring these warnings is not acceptable. --Hammersoft (talk) 01:51, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:\/1YC3

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Draft:\/1YC3, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Praxidicae (talk) 01:45, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

\/1Y(3 is a real movie.

Here is a link to it so you can watch it. Please watch the entire thing. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZfY2_1m-2Jk Merlingoes (talk) 01:54, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

• It doesn't matter if it's "real" or not. It's mere existence is meaningless. There's a tree in my front yard. It exists too. That doesn't make it worthy of an encyclopedia article. As I've told you twice before, you need to read through Wikipedia:Notability (films) and show how this film equals or surpasses that guideline. I can tell you now, there's no way it will pass. 77 views? Sorry, it's just not notable. --Hammersoft (talk) 02:00, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
  • I have read that Notability thing. I cannot get any big newspaper to review my movie. I just made the movie. It's a good movie. Please watch the whole thing, THEN decide. I would not have to make this article if your Encyclopedia already had an article on it. I made an article on it because your site does not have an article on it. Nobody knows it exists, but it is accessible for anybody. Anybody who wants to watch and review it can. Merlingoes (talk) 02:06, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
    • It isn't for me to decide if a movie is notable or not. That's the job of reliable, secondary sources. If nobody knows the movie exists, there's no way it would be acceptable for an article here. Wikipedia is not a means of promotion where you get to advertise your movie. --Hammersoft (talk) 02:08, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
      • I did not make the article for self-promotion, I made it because it exists, it's an OK movie, and it doesn't have an article on here. I have no monetary or fame-related stakes. My movie exists, you can watch it. It's a pretty good movie. I impersonate four members of the Bush Administration using printed photos. it's notable because it only has me in it and it uses pieces of paper to represent politicians. Merlingoes (talk) 02:10, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
        • If it is your movie, then you have a direct conflict of interest. Your insistence that this should have an article will continue to fall on deaf ears unless you find reliable, secondary sources attesting to its notability. I've repeated this multiple times now, and you do not seem willing to do this. Either that, or they don't exist. Either way, there's nothing further to discuss here. --Hammersoft (talk) 02:12, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
          • You see, I could pretend like it's not my movie, but I've chosen to be honest here. I bet I do have a conflict of interest here, with my movie article. If you want, you can edit it so it's more unbiased. I have no problem with you editing my article- only with you rejecting it, since it's a real movie and it's OK. I have only made the movie. I cannot be held responsible if people don't look at my movie. They could watch it any time they wanted. It is free. I cannot provide references but it exists. I already made one account but I was blocked. I hope this does not happen again. I'm getting sick of this. Merlingoes (talk) 02:16, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

Do not remove speedy deletion taggings

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Draft:\/1YC3, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. --Hammersoft (talk) 02:58, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

WP:AN/I notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is located at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Merlingoes. Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 03:18, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

January 2019

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Merlingoes (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Yes, I fully admit to that. What's wrong with me re-creating my fine article? It's an OK article for an OK movie, and I wouldn't have to use this account if you hadn't blocked my first one.

Decline reason:

I don't think I've ever seen a clearer case of "I don't hear that" even in real life. Talk page access revoked. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 17:14, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Merlingoes (talk) 16:55, 31 January 2019 (UTC)